Clinical Comparison of Bulk-fill and Incremental Composite Resin Restorations
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Tooth Disease
- Sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Enrollment
- 28
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Clinical performances of different restorative systems according to USPHS criteria
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The clinical performance of a 5-mm bulk-fill and an incremental resin composite in class II restorations will be evaluated and compared. After recruiting participants with at least 2 approximal caries lesions, all restorations will be placed by a single clinician. All caries lesions will be removed before restoring. Cavities will be divided into two groups: a 5 mm bulk-fill composite resin [Filtek™ Bulk Fill Posterior, 3M ESPE, St. Paul MN, USA (FB)] and an incremental posterior composite resin [Filtek Ultimate Universal, 3M ESPE, St. Paul MN, USA (FU)] All restorative procedures will be conducted according to manufacturers' instructions. Restorations will be scored using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria after a week (baseline) 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. Descriptive statistics will be performed using chi-square tests.
Investigators
Dr. Fatma Dilşad Öz
Assoc. Prof.
Hacettepe University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •age range will be 18 to 65
- •patients should have at least 2 approximal caries lesions require restoration
- •healthy periodontal status
- •a good likelihood of recall availability
Exclusion Criteria
- •poor gingival health
- •adverse medical history
- •potential behavioral problems
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Clinical performances of different restorative systems according to USPHS criteria
Time Frame: two years
Two year results according to USPHS criteria