Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Dry Needling in Non Specific Chronic Neck Pain

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Non Specific Chronic Neck Pain

• Registration Number: NCT06891963
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare between the effectiveness of Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (Acupuncture-like TENS) and dry needling on pain intensity, Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of upper trapezius myofascial trigger points, neck range of motion, and neck function in patients with non specific chronic neck pain.

Detailed Description

The incidence of myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) has been found to vary from 30% to 95% of people who have presented to pain treatment clinics. MPS is common and causes much disability and inability to work so that affect the economy and productivity of workers and employees. According to a previous study, physiotherapy is the most common method used to apply non-invasive techniques and may include the use of modalities for pain relief such as manual therapy, bracing, exercise, Electrical stimulation, kinesio tape, and ultrasound therapy and activity modification. Physiotherapy treatment is recommended to reduce pain, to restore range of motion, function and to strength and stabilize the spine .Trigger points may be relived through many non-pharmacological techniques such as spray and stretch transcutaneous electrical stimulation, massage and dry needing.

Electrotherapy has been widely used as a hypoalgesic agent, which typically involves transcutaneous nerve stimulation. Another well-known hypoalgesic technique is dry needling.

* Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (Acupuncture-like TENS): Acupuncture-like TENS

* Acupuncture-like or Low frequency/High intensity TENS parameters include a low frequency (usually 1-4Hz), a high intensity (high enough to produce visible muscle contractions) and a long pulse duration (\~200μs). Acupuncture-like TENS primarily stimulates the Group III (Aδ) and IV (C) nociceptive fibres and small motor fibres. As the mechanism of pain relief associated with this TENS mode requires afferent signals from muscle receptors, the electrodes should be positioned to produce visible muscle contractions, e.g. over a myotome related to the painful area. The user will therefore experience par aesthesia and muscle contraction (twitching type) with this mode. As muscle contractions occur, additional sensory information is carried from the muscle spindle via muscle afferents. This mode of TENS is believed to operate primarily through the release of endogenous opioids via the descending pain suppression system; therefore, there is a relatively longer onset to analgesia but the analgesia typically lasts longer with this mode than with Conventional TENS.

Dry needling (DN) uses a fine, solid needle and is also known as intramuscular stimulation clinical and scientific interest in DN has grown exponentially and various treatment effects are being credited to DN, such as: decreased pain and muscle tension, improved range of motion, muscle strength and coordination.

Although there are many previous studies on the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and dry needling on upper trapezius trigger points, there is no study comparing the therapeutic efficacy between them. However, till now no study compared the therapeutic potential of both modalities. So, this study will be conducted to compare between the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and dry needling in upper trapezius myofascial trigger point.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2025-03
• Study First Submitted: 2025-03-18
• Study First Submitted QC: 2025-03-18
• Last Update Submitted: 2025-03-18
• Study First Posted: 2025-03-24
• Last Update Posted: 2025-03-24
• Study Start: 2025-03-25
• Primary Completion: 2025-05-25
• Study Completion: 2025-05-31

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

Having at least 1 active trigger point in upper trapezius muscles will use a recommended diagnostic criterion to find active MTrPs which is:

• The presence of a palpable taut band in the skeletal muscle.
• The presence of a hypersensitive spot in the taut band.
• Local twitch response provoked by snapping palpation.
• Production of a typical referred pain pattern in response to the compression of tender spots.
• Spontaneous presence of the typical referred pain pattern.
• Duration of symptoms of acute stage (2-4) weeks.
• Age between (20-40) years.
• Having a normal neurological examination result .

Exclusion Criteria

• Existence of cervical disc hernia, advanced cervical osteoarthritis, radiculopathy, or myelopathy.
• Having trigger point injection or physical therapy in the last 6 months.
• Having a rheumatologic disease, such as fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, or a hormonal disease, such as hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism or hyperparathyroidism.
• Existence of kyphosis, scoliosis, forward head posture or cervicogenic headache.
• History of spine surgery.
• Having a cardiovascular problem.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Assessment of neck pain intensity	4 weeks	The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used to evaluate pain intensity. It is a horizontal line whose length is 10 cm; its left end (zero) indicates no pain, while its right end (ten) reveals the worst imaginable pain. Each subject will be in relaxed position and will be asked to mark the point on the line that exactly corresponded to his/her pain.
Assessment of pressure pain threshold (PPT)	4 weeks	The pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be assessed by positioning the tip of the algometer on the trigger point and increasing the pressure by 1 kg per second. When the patient indicates discomfort, the pressure value will be recorded in kg/cm. The procedure will be repeated three times at 60 s intervals, and the mean pressure value will be recorded as the PPT.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Measurement of cervical extension ROM	4 weeks	It will be measured for all participants in the three groups pre- and post-treatment, using the CROM device. Each participant will asked to perform cervical extension three times and the mean value will be recorded.
Measurement of cervical lateral flexion to the right ROM	4 weeks	It will be measured for all participants in the three groups pre- and post-treatment, using the CROM device. Each participant will asked to perform cervical lateral flexion to the right three times and the mean value will be recorded.
Measurement of cervical flexion range of motion (ROM)	4 weeks	It will be measured for all participants in the three groups pre- and post-treatment, using the CROM device. Each participant will asked to perform cervical flexion three times and the mean value will be recorded.
Measurement of cervical lateral flexion to the left ROM	4 weeks	It will be measured for all participants in the three groups pre- and post-treatment, using the CROM device. Each participant will asked to perform cervical lateral flexion to the left three times and the mean value will be recorded.
Measurement of cervical rotation to the right ROM	4 weeks	It will be measured for all participants in the three groups pre- and post-treatment, using the CROM device. Each participant will asked to perform cervical rotation to the right three times and the mean value will be recorded.
Measurement of cervical rotation to the left ROM	4 weeks	It will be measured for all participants in the three groups pre- and post-treatment, using the CROM device. Each participant will asked to perform cervical rotation to the left three times and the mean value will be recorded.
Assessment of neck function	4 weeks	The Neck Disability Index (NDI) will be used to assess functional status for all participants in the three groups before and after treatment. The NDI is a 10-item questionnaire assessing personal care, pain, reading, lifting, concentration, headaches, work, driving, sleeping, and recreation. Each item is scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (total disability), with a maximum possible score of 50. Participants will select the answer that best describes their neck function. Total scores are categorized as follows: 0-4 (no disability), 5-14 (mild disability), 15-24 (moderate disability), 25-34 (severe disability), and 35+ (complete disability).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Zagazig general hospital; 🇪🇬 Zagazig, Egypt