MedPath

Comparison of Chitosan and Carboxymethylcellulose Silver Dressings on Burn Wounds in Pediatric and Adult Subjects

Phase 4
Withdrawn
Conditions
Bandages
Interventions
Device: Opticell Ag+
Device: Aquacel Ag+
Registration Number
NCT02353507
Lead Sponsor
Medline Industries
Brief Summary

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, comparative multi-center study is to compare the effective management of two silver-based dressings in managing exudative wounds in first and second degree burns.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
WITHDRAWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  • Inpatient status at the site
  • Written consent obtained from the subject
  • Burn injury must have been incurred within 36 hours prior to enrollment.
  • Burn injury must be of superficial partial thickness, mid-dermal partial thickness, or a combination of the two depths
  • Burn injury must exceed 3% total body surface area.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subject is pregnant.
  • Bone fractures.
  • Inhalation-related trauma.
  • Sensitive and/or allergic to materials containing silver.
  • Burn injury exceeds 40% total body surface area.
  • Burn injury diagnosis indicates deep partial or full thickness wounds.
  • Burn a result of electrical/chemical injury or frostbite.
  • An active agent, such as a topical antimicrobial or an enzymatic debriding agent was previously used to treat the burn injury in question.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Opticell Ag+Opticell Ag+Absorbent, antibacterial, barrier dressing
Aquacel Ag+Aquacel Ag+Absorbent, antibacterial, barrier dressing
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Wound Infection RatesUp to 21 days of use
Days required for wound healingUp to 21 days of use
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Pain Levels during Dressing RemovalUp to 21 days

Categorical scale of pain reported by Subject

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath