Clinical evaluation of Restorations in Anterior Teeth with Composite Resin using the cloud shades concept

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Dental Caries; Fracture of teeth

• Registration Number: RBR-7dm3sp7
• Lead Sponsor: Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Results First Posted: 1900-01-01
• Study Start: 2022-11-14
• Last Update Posted: 29 May 2023
• Study Completion: 2025-07-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: ot yet recruiting
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

Two anterior permanent teeth requiring restorations in each patient (two class III or two class IV), large cavities or defective restorations with similar dimensions and including the same number of tooth surfaces; presence of the antagonist and opposing teeth making contact; vital pulp; good oral health, age between 18 and 70 years; both genders

Exclusion Criteria

Extremely deep caries lesions, unrestorable crown; mechanical pulp exposure during caries removal; teeth previously treated with direct pulp capping; teeth exhibiting spontaneous or constant pain indicating irreversible pulpitis; severe systemic diseases; allergies to dental composites; periodontal disease; deleterious parafunctional habits and bruxism; hypersensitivity on the teeth to be restored

Study & Design

• Study Type: Intervention
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To evaluate the clinical success of the restorations after 24 months, using the method proposed by the International Dental Federation, which consists of assigning scores according to biological (six criteria), functional (six criteria) and esthetic (four criteria) properties. For each criterion, the scores clinically excellent, clinically good, clinically satisfactory, clinically unsatisfactory or clinically poor may be applied. The scores excellent, good and satisfactory will be grouped together as ACCEPTABLE Overall Score” and will represent the clinical success of the restoration. The scores unsatisfactory and poor will be grouped as UNACCEPTABLE Overall score” and will signify restoration failure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
To evaluate the clinical success of the restorations after 12 months, using the method proposed by the International Dental Federation, which consists of assigning scores according to biological (six criteria), functional (six criteria) and esthetic (four criteria) properties. For each criterion, the scores clinically excellent, clinically good, clinically satisfactory, clinically unsatisfactory or clinically poor may be applied. The scores excellent, good and satisfactory will be grouped together as ACCEPTABLE Overall Score” and will represent the clinical success of the restoration. The scores unsatisfactory and poor will be grouped as UNACCEPTABLE Overall score” and will signify restoration failure