MedPath

A study to compare effects of two different surgery techniques on speech in children with tongue tie

Phase 4
Recruiting
Conditions
Medical and Surgical, (2) ICD-10 Condition: Q381||Ankyloglossia,
Registration Number
CTRI/2023/11/060236
Lead Sponsor
MGM Dental College and Hospital
Brief Summary

Ankyloglossia, commonly known as tongue-tie, is a congenital anomaly characterized by an abnormally short lingual frenulum. The phenotype varies from absence of clinical significance to rare complete ankyloglossia where the ventral part of the tongue is fused to the floor of the mouth. Ankyloglossia is anatomically characterized by an abnormally short, thick, or tight tongue frenulum and limits tongue movement, which may contribute to multiple dysfunctions, including difficulties in breastfeeding, swallowing, and speech articulation. Tongue-tie has been suggested to cause breast-feeding difficulties (sore nipples, poor infant weight gain, early weaning), speech disorders (impaired articulation), problems with deglutition and dentition, oral-motor dysfunction and social issues related to the limited function of the tongue. Tongue-tie can be considered a relatively common anomaly with a prevalence of approximately 4—5%. For unknown reasons the abnormality seems to be more common in males with male to female ratio of 2.3—2.7:1.0 Despite the fact that breastfeeding problems are thought to be the

most common therapeutic indication among newborn infants with ankyloglossia, defects in articulation are the main complaints of preschoolers and older children.

Recognition of the negative role of a short lingual frenulum led specialists to develop sophisticated protocols to investigate infants and children with short lingual frenuluae, but the association between a short lingual frenulum and OSAS is currently unrecognized. The most common method to correct ankyloglossia is by the surgical excision of aberrant frenal attachments.

Although a lot of literature is available on the methods and techniques to correct ankyloglossia , scant literature is available in which postoperative speech has been assessed with the use of different techniques. Thus, the present study aims to evaluate and compare the speech outcomes with the use of 2 different techniques of closure. The study also aims to evaluate the improvement in the anatomy of the airway as a direct result of frenectomy , if any.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Open to Recruitment
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria

Patients within the age group 03 to 11 years.

Exclusion Criteria
  • Any congenital abnormality in the craniofacial region.
  • Children with abnormal mental development.
  • Cleft abnormalities affecting speech.
  • Maxillofacial deformities affecting speech.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To evaluate and compare Speech Articulation Outcomes following Frenectomy with Linear Closure versus Z Plasty for Management of Ankyloglossia in Paediatric subjectsPreoperative speech evaluation. | Postoperative speech evaluation at 3 months.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To evaluate and compare Volume of the Upper Airway followingFrenectomy with Linear Closure versus Z Plasty for Management of Ankyloglossia in Paediatric subjects.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

MGM DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL

🇮🇳

Raigarh, MAHARASHTRA, India

MGM DENTAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
🇮🇳Raigarh, MAHARASHTRA, India
Dr Varad Rajendra Saptarshi
Principal investigator
9860203496
drvaradsaptarshi@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.