Cost-effectiveness Analysis on Remote Monitoring for Cardiovascular Electronic Implantable Devices in Japan by Using Systematic Review Methodology - 2018 Reimbursement Update
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 1
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Differences of ICERs based on earned QALYs from selected studies by applying to Japanese reimbursement environment.
研究概览
简要总结
2018 Revision of Health Reimbursement in Japan recognized non face-to-face diagnostics, such as Online Treatment, as the standard of care. There was a significantly additional cost for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) Management Fee as well. The adaption of Remote Monitoring for CIEDs patients is recommended by the societies based on the clinical evidences. However, how QALYs earned by CIEDs Remote Monitoring are justified in Japanese reimbursement environment from the cost-effectiveness standpoint is still not so clear. The evaluation about the impact on the health economics about the installation of CIEDs Remote Monitoring has not been enough due to the lack of the researches around this field. Therefore this research is designed to examine the impact of the installation of CIEDs Remote Monitoring from the health economics perspective by considering the health insurance system and the clinical process in Japan, through Systematic Review methodology.
详细描述
2018 Revision of Health Reimbursement in Japan recognized non face-to-face diagnostics, such as Online Treatment, as the standard of care. There was a significantly additional cost for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) Management Fee as well. The adaption of Remote Monitoring for CIEDs patients is recommended by the societies based on the clinical evidences. However, how QALYs earned by CIEDs Remote Monitoring are justified in Japanese reimbursement environment from the cost-effectiveness standpoint is still not so clear. The evaluation about the impact on the health economics about the installation of CIEDs Remote Monitoring has not been enough due to the lack of the researches around this field. Therefore this research is designed to examine the impact of the installation of CIEDs Remote Monitoring from the health economics perspective by considering the health insurance system and the clinical process in Japan, through Systematic Review methodology.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Studies that involves CIEDs Remote Monitoring, such as Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, and Pacemaker
- •Follow-up periods more than or equal to 12 months
- •Prospective studies
- •QALYs available to make ICER analysis possible
- •Published after Year of 1971
排除标准
- •Studies that are not related with CIEDs
- •Follow-up periods less than 12 months
- •Not prospective studies
- •QALYs unavailable
- •Published before Year or 1971
结局指标
主要结局
Differences of ICERs based on earned QALYs from selected studies by applying to Japanese reimbursement environment.
时间窗: 12 months
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Tomoya SHIRANE
Principal Investigator
The Open University of Japan