Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Lip and Palate Deformaties in Neonates Using Two Different Approaches
- Conditions
- Evaluation
- Interventions
- Device: nasoalveolar molding applianceDevice: digital nasoalveolar molding appliance
- Registration Number
- NCT06522217
- Lead Sponsor
- Tanta University
- Brief Summary
This study was conducted to compare the use of conventional nasoalveolar molding appliances and the use of digitally designed and produced nasoalveolar molding appliances in rehabilitating neonates born with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.
- Detailed Description
For this prospective study, twenty newborns with non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate were referred from the Outpatient Clinics of several pediatric surgeons and obstetricians to the Department of Prosthodontics -Faculty of Dentistry - Tanta University.
Inclusion criteria:
* Age range from 2-3 weeks after birth.
* Only the Non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate neonates.
* Newborn infants without any surgical intervention.
Exclusion criteria:
* Patients with the life threatening syndromes.
* Respiratory difficulties are not considered for presurgical treatment.
* Uncooperative guardians.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Age range from 2-3 weeks after birth.
- Only the Non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate neonates.
- Newborn infants without any surgical intervention.
- Patients with the life threatening syndromes.
- Respiratory difficulties are not considered for presurgical treatment.
- Uncooperative guardians.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Conventional Group A nasoalveolar molding appliance 10 neonates receiving conventional nasoalveolar molding appliances Digital Group B digital nasoalveolar molding appliance 10 neonates receiving CAD- nasoalveolar molding appliances
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method extraoral measurements 3-4 months * Nostril height in (mm)
* Nasal dome height in (mm)
* Columella height in( mm)
* Nostril basal width in (mm)
* Nostril width in (mm)intraoral measurements 3 -4 months measuring 2 points the first is the intersegmental distance in (mm) and the second is the alveolar width in (mm)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Dentistry -Tanta university
🇪🇬Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt