Study About Group and Phone Follow-Up After a Crisis
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 59
- 试验地点
- 4
- 主要终点
- Perceived Burdensomeness
研究概览
简要总结
Crisis stabilization centers (CSCs) provide a less costly and more comfortable alternative to Emergency Department care for individuals with suicidal crises. With demand for crisis alternatives growing, effective interventions that fit the unique workflows and workforce of CSCs are needed to realize their life-saving potential. To address this need, the investigators will adapt, and pilot test the effectiveness of an interpersonally enhanced recovery and follow-up intervention delivered during and after admissions acute suicidal crises.
详细描述
The US is poised for growth and investment in our mental health crisis system, with a national phone/text line launching, accompanied by new funding for crisis services. More than 600 Crisis Stabilization Centers (CSCs) across the US provide suicidal clients with a more comfortable and less costly alternative to Emergency Department (ED) care. In light of rising demand, there is an urgent need for feasible, effective, interpersonal, recovery-oriented interventions. This study adapts and tests a novel intervention for delivery prior to and after discharge from CSCs. THRIVE uses the Interpersonal Theory of Suicide as a framework to bolster social connectedness and counter perceived burdensomeness.
Preliminary data shows promising results. However, CSC workflows and culture require context-specific adaptation. This study leverages the Model for Adaptation Design and Impact to adapt THRIVE for CSCs, test feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness, and conduct a pilot RCT in two CSCs. The CSC-adapted intervention addresses interpersonal drivers of suicide risk and bolsters safety, recovery, and community linkage through: (a) a 'belonging and giving' group during CSC stay, (b) recovery coaching calls for 4 weeks post-discharge, and (c) an optional phone app that provides reinforcement and resources for connection. The pilot will compare THRIVE + Discharge/Safety Planning (D/SP) to D/SP alone, examining the degree to which THRIVE engages the targeted mechanisms of change at one- and three-months post-discharge.
Aim 1. Adapt THRIVE and complete CSC-specific manual using MADI.
Aim 2. Test feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness of THRIVE for CSCs. CSC Guests (n = 20). 75% of guests will participate in a THRIVE group and at least one follow-up session within one month of discharge. Ratings of acceptability and satisfaction will be ≧ 75%.
CSC Staff (n = 4). Fidelity ratings of audio recordings of group and coaching calls with be at least
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Admission to CSC with suicidal crisis, as defined by active suicide ideation ascertained by the Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating scale, which the sites already routinely administer.
- •Ability and willingness to provide information for and permission to contact one person in case of emergency or inability to reach the participant for follow-up
排除标准
- •Inability to communicate with the researcher in English.
- •Acute psychiatric instability (e.g., psychotic symptoms). Most patients with psychosis are transferred to Emergency Departments instead of CSCs, so we do not expect many exclusions based on this criterion.
- •Inability to access a phone to participate in phone follow-up program.
研究组 & 干预措施
THRIVE + Discharge / Safety Planning
Participants assigned to the intervention condition will receive THRIVE Crisis Recovery and Care Transition Program, which consists of group-based reflections on "giving and belonging" and a plan for community connection and treatment, followed by 3-4 coaching calls to reinforce and troubleshoot the plans.
干预措施: THRIVE (Toward Hope, Recovery, Interpersonal Growth, Values, and Engagement) (Behavioral)
Discharge / Safety Planning Alone
Participants assigned to the control condition will receive Discharge/Safety Planning as it is practiced by Connections Health Solutions per industry best practices.
干预措施: Discharge / Safety Planning (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Perceived Burdensomeness
时间窗: 3 months after discharge
Perceived Burdensomeness Items of Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire. Scale has 5 items scored 0 to 2. Range= 0-10 (lower=better outcome)
Treatment Initiation
时间窗: 3 months after discharge
Psychological Problem Area subscale of the Treatment Services Review. This scale consists of 5 service review items in which the person states the number of times s/he received a specified service. Outcome of interest is 0 v. \> 0. \>0 = treatment initiation.
Thwarted Belongingness
时间窗: 3 months after discharge
Thwarted Belongingness Items of Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire. Scale has 5 items scored 0 to 2. Range= 0-10 (lower=better outcome)
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Anthony Pisani
Professor
University of Rochester
