Lacosamide Versus Topiramate in Migraine
- Conditions
- Migraine Disorders
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT06243692
- Lead Sponsor
- Kafrelsheikh University
- Brief Summary
Investigators aim to compare the effect of lacosamide versus topiramate in migraine by assessing the absolute reduction in MMD in each group, the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency.
- Detailed Description
Investigators will enroll 600 migraine patients who are diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria in our study and will use a questionnaire to detect their demographic and clinical features (disease duration, attack frequency, and duration, pain intensity assessed by the visual analogic scale and we have two groups the first group will include 300 patients and will receive 50 mg lacosamide twice daily and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg in acute attack, and the second group will receive topiramate100 mg per day and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg in acute attack for at least three months. Investigators will assess The number of migraine days after three months of treatment and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency (14).. HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 600
- Naive migraine patients, according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition, aged 10-55 years,
- Patients with major neurological disorders such as ( epilepsy, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, multiple sclerosis, mitochondrial diseases, brain tumors, and patients with essential tremors.
Patients with major systemic diseases such as malignancy, collagen, liver, and renal diseases.
Patients with cardiovascular diseases like hypertension (systolic blood pressure of more than 130 and/or diastolic blood pressure of more than 85 mm/Hg on at least three different occasions, diabetes (fasting plasma glucose level >126 mg/dl and/or a casual plasma glucose >200 mg/dl and/or HbA1C more than 6.5.
patients with valvular and ischemic heart diseases, bradycardia or heart blocks, congestive heart failure patients who received prophylactic treatment for migraine, patients with any contraindications to drugs used in the study Patients with topiramate or lacosamide contraindications
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description lacosamide arm Lacosamide 50 MG The arm will include 300 migraine patients diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria. All patients will receive Lacosamide 50 mg twice daily and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg only in acute migraine attacks for 3 months. We will assess The change in migraine days per 28 days, the number of migraine days after three months of treatment, and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency (14). HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months. Topiramate arm Topiramate 50Mg Tab The arm will include 300 migraine patients diagnosed according to ICHD3-beta criteria. All patients will receive topiramate 100 mg daily and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg only in acute migraine attacks for 3 months. We will assess The change in migraine days per 28 days, the number of migraine days after three months of treatment, and the percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency (14). HIT-6 score reduction in each group after three months of treatment. The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The change in migraine days per 28 days 28 days The investigators will assess the change in migraine days per 28 days in each group.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The total number of migraine days after three months of treatment 3 months The investigators will assess the total migraine days after three months of regular use of 50 mg lacosamide twice daily and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg in acute attack or topiramate (100 mg daily) and Acetaminophen 500-1000 mg in acute attack alone.
The percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly migraine days frequency compared to the baseline frequency. 3 months We will assess The percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 50% reduction in the monthly headache days frequency compared to the baseline frequency in each group
HIT-6 score absolute reduction in each group after three months of treatment 3 months The investigators assessed the absolute reduction in HIT6 score, the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) assessed the burden of headache in each group; the HIT-6 consists of six items: pain, social functioning, role functioning, vitality, cognitive functioning, and psychological distress, the patient answers each of the six related questions using one of the following five responses: "never", "rarely", "sometimes", "very often," or "always." These responses are summed to produce a total HIT-6 score that ranges from 36 to 78, where a higher score indicates a greater impact of headache on the daily life of the respondent. It has four impact grades: little-to-no impact (HIT-6 score: 36-49), moderate impact (HIT-6 score: 50-55), substantial impact (HIT-6 score: 56-59), and severe impact (HIT-6 score: 60-78)
The safety of lacosamide was evaluated by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) for three months. 3 months The safety of treatment was evaluated by monitoring and documenting treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in patients through regular follow-up procedures for three months.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Kafr Elsheikh University Hospital
🇪🇬Kafr Ash Shaykh, Egypt