NCT05612958
Completed
N/A
Efficacy and Safety of a 'Graft/Prosthesis, Biomaterial (DKM410)' in the Treatment of Both Nasolabial Folds: Single Center, Prospective, Comparative, Randomized, Double Blinded (Subject, Evaluator), Matched Pairs Design, Non-inferiority, Pivotal Clinical Trial
ConditionsNasolabial Folds
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Nasolabial Folds
- Sponsor
- Dongkook Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Enrollment
- 82
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change in WSRS(Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) score by independent evaluators from Baseline to Week 24.
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a 'Graft/prosthesis, biomaterial (DKM410)' in the treatment of both nasolabial folds.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age 19 years and older
- •Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) 3 or 4
- •Visually symmetrical bilateral nasolabial folds
- •Agreed not to use any dermatological treatment and wrinkle-improving functional cosmetics.
- •Voluntarily decided to participate in the study and signed the informed consent form
- •Willing to follow the protocol
Exclusion Criteria
- •History of undergoing a permanent or semi-permanent filler treatment on the face
- •Received soft tissue augmentation using HA filler or collagen for nasolabial folds within 18 months from screening.
- •Received any surgery or laser treatment, chemical filling, heart attack, or Botox injection within 24 weeks from the screening
- •History of allergic reactions to Hyaluronic Acid or Gram-positive bacteria protein
- •Hypersensitivity to Lidocaine or amide local anesthetic
- •Positive for the intradermal response test
- •History of severe or plurality of allergies
- •Having skin inflammation or infection in nasolabial folds
- •History of keloid formation, hyperpigmentation, or hypertrophic scars on the face.
- •History of streptococcal disease
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change in WSRS(Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale) score by independent evaluators from Baseline to Week 24.
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Independent evaluators evaluate the WSRS score change at Week 24 compared to baseline.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale(WSRS) score by independent evaluators from Baseline to Weeks 8, 16 and 48.(Baseline and Weeks 8, 16 and 48.)
- Success rate of treatment(N%) by independent evaluators from Baseline to Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 48.(Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 48.)
- Change in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale(WSRS) score by investigator from Baseline to Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 48.(Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 48.)
- Success rate of treatment(N%) by investigator from Baseline to Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 48.(Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 48.)
- Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) from Baseline to Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 48.(Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24 and 48.)
- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) after the treatment.(Baseline)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Active, Not Recruiting
N/A
Multi-sensory Intervention Room Application (MIRA) Device in the NSICUPost Intensive Care SyndromeNCT06509815Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai34
Recruiting
N/A
Assessing the Usability and Reliability of the Prototype Prosthesis DevicesAmputationTraumatic AmputationsLeg AmputationNCT06616402Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus15
Active, Not Recruiting
N/A
The Effectiveness of Biomimetic Materials in Preventing Enamel Demineralization During Fixed Orthodontic TreatmentEnamel Hypomineralization, DentalNCT05940701University of Baghdad65
Completed
N/A
Chyme Reinfusion for Type 2 Intestinal FailureIntestinal FailureEnterocutaneous FistulaIleostomy - StomaHigh Output StomaNCT04577456The Insides Company44
Unknown
N/A
Safety, Efficacy and Operability of Using the New Tissue Containment System During Laprascopic HysterectomyGynecologic SurgeryNCT04423172Jing Liang120