Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07363226
NCT07363226
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

Efficacy of Two Different Exercises Approach: Core Stabilization Exercises Versus Traditional Rehabilitation on Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis-A Single Blind Randomized Control Trial

Armed Forces Hospitals, Southern Region, Saudi Arabia1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2026Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Armed Forces Hospitals, Southern Region, Saudi Arabia
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in Cobb's Angle

Overview

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of core stabilization exercises versus traditional rehabilitation exercises in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Participants are assigned to one of two intervention groups: a core stabilization exercise program or a traditional rehabilitation program. The study evaluates the impact of both interventions on spinal stability, posture, and functional outcomes. The results of this study may help identify more effective rehabilitation approaches for managing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
11 Years to 18 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Female adolescents aged 11-18 years
  • Diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis
  • Cobb's angle between 10° and 40°
  • Referred to physiotherapy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Congenital, neuromuscular, or secondary scoliosis
  • Previous spine surgery or spinal correction
  • Presence of rheumatologic, renal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, or vestibular disorders
  • Inability to follow verbal instructions

Arms & Interventions

core stabilization exercises group

Experimental

A supervised core stabilization exercise program targeting deep and global trunk musculature including the transversus abdominis, multifidus, pelvic floor, diaphragm, rectus abdominis, erector spinae, and oblique muscles. The program was delivered three times per week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting 45 minutes. Exercises were progressively advanced from static to dynamic tasks according to participant tolerance and performance.

Intervention: Core stabilization Exercises program (Behavioral)

Traditional Rehabilitation Exercise Program

Experimental

A supervised traditional physiotherapy program including postural correction exercises, diaphragmatic breathing, spinal mobility exercises, stretching of muscles on the concave side of the curve, and general strengthening exercises for trunk, pelvic, and shoulder girdle musculature. The program was delivered three times per week for 12 weeks, with each session lasting 45 minutes.

Intervention: Traditional Rehabilitation exercises program (Behavioral)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in Cobb's Angle

Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Cobb's angle measured using the DIERS Formetric 4D spinal analysis system in static mode

Secondary Outcomes

  • 1. Maximum Axial Vertebral Rotation (Max AVR)(Baseline and 12 weeks)
  • Pelvic Obliquity(Baseline and 12 weeks)
  • Quality of Life (QoL)(Baseline and 12 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor
Armed Forces Hospitals, Southern Region, Saudi Arabia
Sponsor Class
Other Gov
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Hind Khalid Ali AlQhtani

Principal investigator (physiotherapist)

Armed Forces Hospitals, Southern Region, Saudi Arabia

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials