The NetherLands Registry of Invasive Coronary Vasomotor Function Testing (NL-CFT)
- Conditions
- Coronary VasospasmCoronary Microvascular DysfunctionNon-Obstructive Coronary Atherosclerosis
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: Coronary Function TestOther: Patient questionnaires
- Registration Number
- NCT06083155
- Lead Sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Brief Summary
The goal of this registry is to collect data on patients referred for clinically indicated coronary vasomotor function test (CFT) and answer different questions on prevalence, safety and outcomes. The registry is observational. Patients receive yearly online questionnaires on their anginal complaints for 5 years after their CFT.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 2000
- Referred for clinically indicated CFT
- Not willing to provide informed consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Normal CFT results: no coronary vasomotor dysfunction Coronary Function Test Collection of data on anginal complaints, use of medication and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) by means of online patient questionnaires Normal CFT results: no coronary vasomotor dysfunction Patient questionnaires Collection of data on anginal complaints, use of medication and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) by means of online patient questionnaires Abnormal CFT results: coronary vasomotor dysfunction Coronary Function Test Comparison of patient reported outcomes of different endotype groups Collection of data on anginal complaints, use of medication and MACE by means of online patient questionnaires Abnormal CFT results: coronary vasomotor dysfunction Patient questionnaires Comparison of patient reported outcomes of different endotype groups Collection of data on anginal complaints, use of medication and MACE by means of online patient questionnaires
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Prevalence of coronary vasomotor dysfunction Baseline Can be handled as dichotomous outcome with normal vs abnormal coronary function test (CFT) results. Alternatively, can also be handled as categorical outcome with the following categories.
1. Normal CFT results
2. Vasospastic endotype (epicardial or microvascular); tested by acetylcholine provocation
3. Microvascular dysfunction endotype (decreased coronary flow reserve or increased index of microvascular resistance); tested by bolus thermodilution, optionallly with additional continuous thermodilution method
4. Mixed endotype
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Angina burden Baseline and every year up to 5 years after baseline Measured by Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score, 0-100 with higher scores indicating better (functional) status.
Experienced quality of life Baseline and every year up to 5 years after baseline Measured by Short Form 36, 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life
Trial Locations
- Locations (15)
Tergooi Hospital
π³π±Hilversum, Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
π³π±Enschede, Netherlands
RadboudUMC
π³π±Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis (OLVG)
π³π±Amsterdam, Netherlands
Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
π³π±Den Haag, Netherlands
Amsterdam UMC
π³π±Amsterdam, Netherlands
Amphia Hospital
π³π±Breda, Netherlands
Rijnstate Hospital
π³π±Arnhem, Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
π³π±Eindhoven, Netherlands
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
π³π±Leeuwarden, Netherlands
Maasstad Ziekenhuis
π³π±Rotterdam, Netherlands
Maastricht UMC
π³π±Maastricht, Netherlands
VieCuri Medisch Centrum
π³π±Venlo, Netherlands
UMC Utrecht
π³π±Utrecht, Netherlands
Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital
π³π±Tilburg, Netherlands