A Prospective Evaluation of Spray Cryotherapy in Patients With Malignant and Benign Central Airway Disease
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 20
- 主要终点
- Adverse events during hospital admission [Safety]
研究概览
简要总结
Rationale: Spray cryotherapy (SCT) using liquid nitrogen has been safely and effectively used in the esophagus, airways and pleura. Treatment with SCT for central airway stenosis may provide an effective, and more durable and perhaps safer alternative to the current therapeutic modalities.
Objectives:
- To investigate the feasibility of using Spray cryotherapy (SCT) for the treatment of malignant and benign central airway disease.
- To investigate the safety of using Spray cryotherapy (SCT) for the treatment of malignant and benign central airway disease.
- To investigate the efficacy of using Spray cryotherapy (SCT) for the treatment of malignant and benign central airway disease.
Study design: This study will be a prospective, single arm, open label intervention study performed at the University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands Study population: The study population exists of 25 patients with malignant or benign central airway disease. Patients in which current treatment options are regarded to be suboptimal can be included in the study.
Intervention: TruFreeze Spray CryoTherapy
Main study parameter:
Feasibility is defined as being able to apply the SCT as planned in one, or more bronchoscopies according to the instructions for use (IFU).
Secondary study parameters:
Safety will be assessed by capturing all adverse events (AEs) that occur 1) during the SCT procedure, and 2) all AEs that occur until hospital discharge.
Efficacy will be measured using 1) patient reported outcomes (questionnaires), 2) percentage improvement in airway stenosis, 3) durability of treatment effect, 4) need to re-intervene with other therapies because of treatment failure.
Nature and extent of the burden, risks and benefit associated with participation.
Patients that will be recruited and participate in this prospective clinical trial have a severe central airway disease which is highly symptomatic for which current available therapies are either very difficult to perform, are hazardous, have no real benefit, or just simply not available yet. The current treatment risks of this patient group are high, especially in the patients where the airway patency is at risk. The main additional risk associated with the use of SCT is the occurrence of a pneumothorax. Patients participating will adhere to their current medical care, with the one addition of a voluntary follow-up bronchoscopy after SCT.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- 未提供
排除标准
- •Patient has an inability to tolerate bronchoscopy under general anaesthesia.
- •Compromised tissue (significant ulceration or mucosal break in the ablation area, any procedure or pre-existing condition has significantly reduced tissue strength or has significantly reduced the elasticity of the ablation area).
- •Airway diameter causing an anatomical flow resistance inhibiting N2 gas evacuation (Endotracheal tube or equivalent <8.5mm will be excluded).
研究组 & 干预措施
Spray cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen
Device: TruFreeze Spray CryoTherapy Drug: Liquid nitrogen
干预措施: TruFreeze Spray CryoTherapy (Device)
Spray cryotherapy using liquid nitrogen
Device: TruFreeze Spray CryoTherapy Drug: Liquid nitrogen
干预措施: Liquid nitrogen (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Adverse events during hospital admission [Safety]
时间窗: Up to 5 days after treatment
Safety will be assessed by capturing all adverse events (AEs) that occur until hospital discharge.
Number of procedures in which SCT was applied as planned [Feasibility]
时间窗: During bronchoscopy procedure
Feasibility is defined as being able to apply the SCT as planned in one, or more bronchoscopies according to the instructions for use
Adverse events during procedure [Safety]
时间窗: During bronchoscopy procedure
Safety will be assessed by capturing all adverse events (AEs) that occur during the SCT procedure.
次要结局
- Time in weeks of durability of initial improvement in airway stenosis[Efficacy](4 weeks follow up)
- Number of patients with need to re-intervene [Efficacy](4 weeks follow up)
- Patient reported outcomes [Efficacy](4 weeks follow up)
- Percentage improvement in airway stenosis [Efficacy](4 weeks follow up)
研究者
Dirk-Jan Slebos
MD PhD
University Medical Center Groningen
