MedPath

Our Experience in the Management of Therapeutic Failures of Fractures of the Proximal End of the Femur (About 35 Cases)

Completed
Conditions
Proximal Femur Fractures
Interventions
Procedure: total hip arthroplasty
Registration Number
NCT06360835
Lead Sponsor
Ibn Jazzar Hospital
Brief Summary

Osteosyntheses employed in treating fractures at the upper end of the femur play a critical role in facilitating a swift recovery by minimizing immobilization periods and enabling early rehabilitation of the affected joints, thereby promoting a speedy return to normal walking function.

Osteosynthesis alters the mechanical dynamics of the bone segment, which undergoes continual changes during the consolidation and mobilization phases of recovery. Throughout these stages, a range of mechanical complications may arise, posing challenges despite the successful prevention of infections. Non-infectious complications associated with the presence of osteosynthesis materials, especially in weight-bearing areas like the lower limb, remain a concern.

In light of these considerations, surgeons must exercise meticulous care in selecting synthetic materials to mitigate the risk of osteosynthesis failures. In cases where internal fixation fails, the standard recourse often involves converting to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

However, it is essential to note that THA subsequent to complications arising from proximal femur osteosynthesis presents a higher incidence of both intraoperative and postoperative complications compared to the implantation of primary total hip prostheses. Thus, while osteosynthesis remains a valuable intervention for femur fractures, careful attention to material selection and postoperative management is crucial in optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing complications.

Detailed Description

The aim was to identify the causes of mechanical failures of osteosynthesis in order to prevent them. Methods: We present the experience of the Department of Surgical Orthopedic Surgery, concerning 35 cases summarized after failure of surgical treatment of a fracture of the proximal end of the femur for a period spreading between January 2015 and December 2021. . The literature already found evidence of the greater complexity of this type of procedure compared to a first-line total hip prosthesis. Accordingly, all this, Prevention is better than cure these stiffnesses through good preoperative planning. Other factors related to the terrain or to untimely loading of the implant are more difficult to control. Whatever the cause, the surgeon remains by the rigor in these indications, the choice of the synthetic material the essential element in the prevention of osteosynthesis failures.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
35
Inclusion Criteria
  • • Diagnosis of a fracture of the proximal end of the femur.

    • Subsequent surgical intervention(s) due to failure of initial surgical treatment
Exclusion Criteria
  • • Those initially treated with total hip arthroplasty.

    • Patients lost to follow-up, not consistently monitored, or untreated after diagnosis of the complication.
    • Cases with incomplete medical records

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
cases of recurrent fractures of the proximal end of the femur following surgical treatment failuretotal hip arthroplasty-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Type of Surgical Revisionfrom enrollment to the of treatment 6 years

material implanted for revision

Surgical Approachfrom enrollment to the of treatment 6 years

type of approach

Preparation of the Patientfrom enrollment to the of treatment 6 years

type of preparation

Anesthesiafrom enrollment to the of treatment 6 years

type of anesthesia

Types of Prosthesisfrom enrollment to the of treatment 6 years

prothesis used

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Distribution According to Affected Sidefrom enrollment to the end of treatment 6 years

The right side was affected in 60% (21 cases), while the left side was affected in 40% (14 cases).

Distribution by Sexfrom enrollment to the end of treatment 6 years

Females represented a slight majority in the study, accounting for 57% (20 women), while males comprised 43% (15 men).

Age Distributionfrom enrollment to the end of treatment 6 years

The average age of patients experiencing therapeutic failure after surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures was 66 years, with ages ranging from 28 to 94 years. The age group 50-90 years constituted 68.59% of cases.

Distribution According to Circumstances of Traumafrom enrollment to the end of treatment 6 years

Fractures were predominantly due to minimal trauma, with rare occurrences related to road accidents or domestic falls, attributed to bone fragility and muscle atrophy. One case of a pathological fracture was observed in a patient with dislocation of an intermediate hip prosthesis due to ovarian cancer.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

IBN jazzar hospital

🇹🇳

Kairouan, Tunisia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath