A Study to Explore the Efficacy of JNJ-67953964 in the Treatment of Depression
- Conditions
- Depressive Disorder, Major
- Interventions
- Drug: JNJ-67953964Drug: Placebo
- Registration Number
- NCT03559192
- Lead Sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of JNJ-67953964 compared to placebo when administered as adjunctive treatment in participants with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) partially responsive to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/ serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) treatment in terms of reduction of symptoms of depression, as assessed by the change from baseline on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in non-responders during the placebo lead-in period.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 181
-
Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18 and 35 kilogram per meter square (kg/m^2) inclusive (BMI = weight/height^2)
-
Participants must be medically stable based on clinical laboratory tests, medical history, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) performed at screening and baseline
-
Participants must have a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5) diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
- The current episode should be less than 18 months
- Participants should be currently treated with an SSRI or SNRI at an adequate dose and for at least 6 weeks but no more than 12 months
- Have a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score greater than or equal to (>=) 25 at screening
-
A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test before the first dose
-
History of documented gastric disease (including documented peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, upper gastrointestinal [GI] bleeding, esophagitis, or any GI precancerous condition), current clinically evident GI complaints
-
Chronic use of a proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). History of incidental use of PPIs is allowed but should have been stopped at least 4 weeks before screening. A history of chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or aspirin use. (Low dose aspirin for example in cardiovascular disease prevention is allowed)
-
Has a history of alcohol use disorder within the past year
-
Has failed (no more than 25 percent [%] response on Antidepressant Treatment History Questionnaire [ATRQ]) three or more antidepressant treatments including the current Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/ serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) during the current depressive episode despite an adequate dose (per ATRQ) and duration (at least 6 weeks)
-
Has signs or symptoms of Cushing's Disease, Addison's Disease, primary amenorrhea, or other evidence of significant medical disorders of the hypothalamus pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis
-
Participant has received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 3 months before the planned first dose of study drug or has participated in any interventional clinical studies on MDD in the previous 1 year or is currently enrolled in an interventional study
-
Has one or more of the following diagnoses:
- A primary DSM (5th edition) diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Participants with comorbid GAD, social anxiety disorder (SAD), or panic disorder for whom MDD is considered the primary diagnosis are not excluded
- A current diagnosis or diagnosis in the past 1 year of psychotic disorder, MDD with psychosis, anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa, chronic fatigue syndrome, bipolar disorder (BD), mental retardation, antisocial or borderline personality disorder, autism spectrum disorder
-
Has a current or recent history of clinically significant suicidal ideation within the past 6 months, corresponding to a score of 4 (active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan) or 5 (active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent) for ideation on the Colombia suicide severity rating scale (C-SSRS), or a history of suicidal behavior within the past 1 year
-
Ongoing psychological treatments (example, Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Interpersonal Psychotherapy, Psychodynamic Psychotherapy, etcetera [etc.]), initiated within 1 month prior to the screening phase. A participant who has been receiving ongoing psychological treatment for a period of greater than 1 month from the screening visit is eligible, if the investigator deems the psychological treatment to be of stable duration and frequency
-
Participant has a history of substance use disorder according to DSM-5 criteria, except nicotine or caffeine, within 6 months before screening. Mild cases can be reviewed on a case by case basis. Participants who have completed a treatment for (alcohol) addiction more than 1 year prior to first dose administration, may be included if the risk of relapse is considered minimal, total duration of alcohol use disorder was less than a year, and no significant abnormalities are shown in clinical laboratory or other pre-dose safety assessments
-
Participant has used:
- Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) within 12 weeks before screening
- St. John's wort, ephedra, ginkgo, ginseng, or kava within 2 weeks before screening
- Antipsychotic drugs (D2-antagonists) within 2 weeks before screening. However, Seroquel (quetiapine) in a dose less than or equals to (<=)100 milligram (mg) is allowed when used in a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to screening. Quetiapine treatment should be continued unchanged during the study
- Opioids within 2 weeks before screening
- Psychostimulants such as methylphenidate or dextroamphetamine within 2 weeks before screening
- Psychotropics with antidepressant effects such as atomoxetine or thyroid supplementation, in addition to their SSRI or SNRI treatment within 2 weeks before screening
-
Participant is unable to stop the following medication from the baseline visit (Visit 2) and throughout the study (tapering during screening period allowed): Any hypnotics including but not limited to: i. Benzodiazepines when used only as needed (PRN) are not allowed ii. Sedating antihistamines, including chronic use of diphenhydramine iii. Continuous use of zolpidem, zoplicon, eszopiclone and ramelteon. Note: Nonbenzodiazepines sleep aids (including: zolpidem, zaleplon, and eszopliclone) are allowed on an as needed (PRN) basis during the study but NOT within 24 hours before being in the clinic and not more than 2 nights in a row iv. S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) v. Melatonin, agomelatine
-
Has received any prior treatment with electroconvulsive therapy, vagal nerve stimulation, or a deep brain stimulation device or treatment with ketamine or esketamine for MDD
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Treatment Period: JNJ-67953964 or Placebo Placebo Participants who respond or do not respond (based on reduction from lead-in baseline in MADRS) in the placebo lead-in period will receive either matching placebo or 10 (2\*5) milligram (mg) JNJ-67953964 capsules in a 1:1 ratio for 6 weeks. Treatment Period: JNJ-67953964 or Placebo JNJ-67953964 Participants who respond or do not respond (based on reduction from lead-in baseline in MADRS) in the placebo lead-in period will receive either matching placebo or 10 (2\*5) milligram (mg) JNJ-67953964 capsules in a 1:1 ratio for 6 weeks. Withdrawal Period: Placebo Placebo Participants who complete the double-blind treatment period prior to the end of Week 11 will receive matching placebo for the remaining time of the treatment phase of the study. Lead-in Period: Placebo Placebo Participants will receive matching placebo for the entire duration of the lead-in period.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Treatment Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Treatment Week 6 in Participants Who Were Non-Responders During Placebo Lead-in Period Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detects changes due to antidepressant treatment. The scale consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. The MADRS evaluates apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep appetite, concentration, lassitude, inability to feel (interest level), pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change From Treatment Baseline in Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) Total Score at Treatment Week 6 (eITT Population) Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period The SHAPS is a self-reported 14-item, instrument, developed for the assessment of hedonic capacity. Participants scored whether they experienced pleasure in performing a list of activities or experiences. Participants rated the answers as 1-4 where 1 indicates "Definitely agree", 2 indicates "Agree", 3 indicates "Disagree" and 4 indicates "Definitely disagree". The participant's item responses were summed to provide a total score ranging from 14 to 56. A higher total SHAPS score indicated higher levels of current anhedonia. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Treatment Baseline in Symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder Scale (SMDDS) Total Score at Treatment Week 6 (eITT Population) Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period The SMDDS is a 16-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure. Each item was rated by the participant according to a 5-point Likert scale. Participants respond to each question using a rating scale between 0 ("Not at all" or "Never") to 4 ("Extremely" or "Always"). Before summing the items to create a total score, item 11 ("how often did you have a poor appetite") and item 12 ("how often did you over eat") were combined into a single score by selecting the highest severity on either item. The total score was then created by summing the responses on the 15 items. The total score ranged from 0 to 60. The SMDDS uses a 7-day recall period and verbal rating scales. Higher score indicates more severe depressive symptomatology. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Treatment Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Treatment Week 6 Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detects changes due to antidepressant treatment. The scale consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed for a total possible score of 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. The MADRS evaluates apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep appetite, concentration, lassitude, inability to feel (interest level), pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During DB Treatment Period Up to Week 6 An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product, whether or not related to that medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product. TEAEs were AEs with onset during the treatment period that has worsened since baseline.
Change From Treatment Baseline in SHAPS Total Score at Treatment Week 6 (fITT) Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period The SHAPS is a self-reported 14-item, instrument, developed for the assessment of hedonic capacity. Participants scored whether they experienced pleasure in performing a list of activities or experiences. Participants rated the answers as 1-4 where 1 indicates "Definitely agree", 2 indicates "Agree", 3 indicates "Disagree" and 4 indicates "Definitely disagree". The participant's item responses were summed to provide a total score ranging from 14 to 56. A higher total SHAPS score indicated higher levels of current anhedonia. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Number of Participants With Self-Assessment of Treatment Experience (SATE) Questionnaire at Treatment Week 6 (eITT Population) Treatment Week 6 SATE questionnaire is a 3-item self-reported scale designed to provide additional information regarding participant's subjective experience while taking treatment. This was internal Janssen questionnaire and questions were asked to participant weekly by the Q1.6-app. For rating overall depression: participant selected one option out of Improved, not changed or got worse; for depression improvement: participant selected one option out of slightly improved, much improved or very much improved; and for depression worsen: participant selected slightly worse, much worse or very much worse.
Number of Participants With SATE Questionnaire at Treatment Week 6 (fITT Population) Treatment Week 6 SATE questionnaire is a 3-item self-reported scale designed to provide additional information regarding participant's subjective experience while taking treatment. This was internal Janssen questionnaire and questions were asked to participant weekly by the Q1.6-app. For rating overall depression: participant selected one option out of Improved, not changed or got worse; for depression improvement: participant selected one option out of slightly improved, much improved or very much improved; and for depression worsen: participant selected slightly worse, much worse or very much worse.
Change From Treatment Baseline in CGI-S Score at Treatment Week 6 (fITT Population) Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period CGI-S provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure of severity of participants illness that considers all available information, including knowledge of participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and impact of symptoms on participant's ability to function. CGI-S evaluates severity of psychopathology on scale of 0 to 7. Participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at time of rating according to: 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among most extremely ill participants. Negative change in score indicates improvement.
Change From Treatment Baseline in HAM-A6 Total Score at Treatment Week 6 (fITT) Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period HAM-A scale assesses severity of different anxiety-related symptoms with a score range of 0 to 52. Higher score indicated severity in anxiety symptoms. Each of the 14 items is rated by clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). HAM-A6 is a uni-dimensional, 6-item subscale derived from HAM-A. HAM-A6 comprises of five psychic anxiety symptoms: anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behaviour observed at the interview, as well as one somatic item, muscular tension. HAM-A6 subscale score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater severity of core symptoms.
Change From Treatment Baseline in SIGH-A Score at Treatment Week 6 (fITT Population) Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period SIGH-A is a 14-item scale to measure severity of different anxiety-related symptoms in participants. Each of the 14 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56 where higher score indicates worsening.
Change From Treatment Baseline in Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Score at Treatment Week 6 (eITT Population) Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period CGI-S provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure of severity of participant's illness that considers all available information, including knowledge of participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and impact of symptoms on participant's ability to function. CGI-S evaluates severity of psychopathology on scale of 0 to 7. Participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at time of rating according to: 0=not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among most extremely ill participants. Negative change in score indicates improvement.
Change From Treatment Baseline in SMDDS Total Score at Treatment Week 6 (fITT Population) Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period The SMDDS is a 16-item patient reported outcome (PRO) measure. Each item was rated by the participant according to a 5-point Likert scale. Participants respond to each question using a rating scale between 0 ("Not at all" or "Never") to 4 ("Extremely" or "Always"). Before summing the items to create a total score, item 11 ("how often did you have a poor appetite") and item 12 ("how often did you over eat") were combined into a single score by selecting the highest severity on either item. The total score was then created by summing the responses on the 15 items. The total score ranged from 0 to 60. The SMDDS uses a 7-day recall period and verbal rating scales. Higher score indicates more severe depressive symptomatology. Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Treatment Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Scale 6 (HAM-A6) Total Score at Treatment Week 6 (eITT Population) Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period HAM-A scale assesses severity of different anxiety-related symptoms with a score range of 0 to 52. Higher score indicated severity in anxiety symptoms. Each of the 14 items is rated by clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). HAM-A6 is a uni-dimensional, 6-item subscale derived from HAM-A. HAM-A6 comprises of five psychic anxiety symptoms: anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behaviour observed at the interview, as well as one somatic item, muscular tension. HAM-A6 subscale score ranges from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater severity of core symptoms.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-67953964 Week 1: Day 29, Week 3: Day 43, Week 6 (Day 64) Cmax was defined as maximum observed plasma concentration of JNJ-67953964.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time of Administration to 24 Hours Post-dose (AUC[0-24h]) of JNJ-67953964 0 to 24 hours Post dose on Week 1: Day 29, Week 3: Day 43, Week 6: Day 64 AUC(0-24h) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of administration to 24 hours.
Area Under Plasma Concentration-Time Curve at Steady State (AUCss) of JNJ-67953964 Week 1: Day 29, Week 3: Day 43, Week 6: Day 64 AUCss was defined as the area under plasma concentration-time curve at Steady State (AUCss) of JNJ-67953964.
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of JNJ-67953964 Predose on Week 1: Day 29, Week 3: Day 43, Week 6: Day 64 C0h was defined as predose plasma Concentration of JNJ-67953964.
Change From Treatment Baseline in Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (SIGH-A) Score at Treatment Week 6 (eITT Population) Treatment Baseline up to Week 6 of DB-treatment period SIGH-A is a 14-item scale to measure severity of different anxiety-related symptoms in participants. Each of the 14 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56 where higher score indicates worsening.
Trial Locations
- Locations (49)
Psychiatric Medicine Associates LLC
🇺🇸Skokie, Illinois, United States
Princeton Medical Institute
🇺🇸Princeton, New Jersey, United States
Richmond Behavioural Associates
🇺🇸Staten Island, New York, United States
Ohio State University
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
Hammersmith Medicines Research Ltd
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Medical and Rehabilitation Research Center Phoenix
🇷🇺Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation
Olympian Clinical Research
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
Saratov Regional Psychiatric hospital named after St. Sofia
🇷🇺Saratov, Russian Federation
MNCE of Kyiv RC Regional Psychiatric and Narcological Medical Association
🇺🇦Glevakha, Ukraine
CNCE 'Cherkasy Regional Psychiatric Hospital of Cherkasy Regional Council'
🇺🇦Smila, Ukraine
Clinical Psychiatric Hospital #3 Named After V.A. Gilyarovsky
🇷🇺Moscow, Russian Federation
Clinical NeuroScience Solutions, Inc
🇺🇸Memphis, Tennessee, United States
SHI 'Saratov City Clinical Hospital 2 n.a V.I. Razumovsky
🇷🇺Saratov, Russian Federation
Psychoneurological dispensary 1
🇷🇺St-Petersburg, Russian Federation
Research Institute of Mental Health
🇷🇺Tomsk, Russian Federation
CNPE'Kherson Regional Institution of Mental Care'of Kherson Regional Council
🇺🇦Kherson, Ukraine
Meridien Research
🇺🇸Tampa, Florida, United States
Advanced Clinical Research
🇺🇸West Jordan, Utah, United States
Somni Bene GmbH
🇩🇪Schwerin, Germany
Medical University of South Carolina
🇺🇸Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Emovis GmbH
🇩🇪Berlin, Germany
Orenburg Regional Clinical Psychiatric Hospital #1
🇷🇺Orenburg, Russian Federation
City Psychiatric hospital 7 named after I.P.Pavlov
🇷🇺St-Petersburg, Russian Federation
St-Petersburg Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute
🇷🇺St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Mnpe of Kharkiv Regional Council 'Regional Clinical Psychiatric Hospital #3'
🇺🇦Kharkiv, Ukraine
Cnce 'Kyiv City Psychoneurological Hospital #2' of Executive Body of Kyiv City Council (Kcsa)
🇺🇦Kyiv, Ukraine
Mnpe 'Regional Clinical Psychiatric Hospital of Kirovohrad Regional Council'
🇺🇦Nove, Kropyvnytskiy, Ukraine
Noble Clinical Research
🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States
Behavioral Research Specialists, LLC
🇺🇸Glendale, California, United States
Preferred Research Partners
🇺🇸Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
NRC Research Institute
🇺🇸Orange, California, United States
Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
🇺🇸San Marcos, California, United States
Innova Clinical Trials
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Pacific Clinical Research Medical Group
🇺🇸Upland, California, United States
Galiz Research
🇺🇸Miami Springs, Florida, United States
APG Research, LLC
🇺🇸Orlando, Florida, United States
Chicago Research Center
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Atlanta Behavioral Research, LLC
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Clinical Trials of America
🇺🇸Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Lake Charles Clinical Trials
🇺🇸Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States
Integrative Clinical Trials, LLC
🇺🇸Brooklyn, New York, United States
Lehigh Center for Clinical Research
🇺🇸Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Midwest Clinical Research Center
🇺🇸Dayton, Ohio, United States
IPS Research Company
🇺🇸Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Paradigm Research Professionals, LLC
🇺🇸Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
ARENSIA
🇲🇩Chisinau, Moldova, Republic of
Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Psychiatric Hospital
🇷🇺Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Engels psychiatric hospital
🇷🇺Saratov Region, Russian Federation
MAC Clinical Research
🇬🇧Manchester, United Kingdom