跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03211598
NCT03211598Unknown不适用

Pilot Trial Assessing the Technical Feasibility and Safety of the Surefire Infusion System for Use in DEB-TACE (Surefire)

Alexander Kim2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 15 人开始时间: 2016年10月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
发起方
入组人数
15
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and safety of the Surefire Infusion System (SIS) for delivery of Drug Eluting Beads Transcatheter Chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in the HCC population. This study will allow us to determine the effectiveness of SIS for HCC in terms of disease response.

详细描述

This is a single arm pilot study to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of performing DEB-TACE using the investigational delivery device: Surefire Infusion System (SIS). Patients presenting with primary liver cancer without evidence of metastatic disease or vascular invasion will be considered for the trial. Patients enrolled in the trial will undergo 1 or 2 sessions of DEB-TACE delivered through SIS as determined by the performing interventional radiologist. Decision for second treatment will be based on the degree of disease burden and vascular anatomy demonstrated on the first treatment session. To limit potential hepatotoxicity, patients with multifocal disease in a single lobe may be treated with a 2nd treatment with the investigational device. Patients with a large lesion being supplied by multiple vessels may also undergo a 2nd treatment session based on the investigator's judgement. The decision to proceed with a second treatment will be determined at the time of the first treatment based on disease burden and vascular anatomy. There will be an interval of 2-4 weeks between treatments. All patients undergoing 2nd treatment will have a repeat laboratory evaluation with treatment deferred for 2-4 weeks for those not meeting initial inclusion criteria. For patients who labs have not normalized at this time will not undergo a 2nd treatment.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Primary liver cancers based on biopsy or imaging criteria
  • Child-Pugh A or B7 liver disease
  • Bilirubin <2.0 mg/dL
  • Albumin >3.0 gm/dL
  • ECOG status 0 or 1
  • Adequate renal function
  • a. Creatinine < 2.0 mg/dL
  • Age 18 or older
  • Able to understand informed consent
  • Life expectancy > 3 months
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum/urine pregnancy test on the day of planned procedure.

排除标准

  • Portal vein thrombus
  • Uncontrolled ascites
  • Hepatic encephalopathy
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy (platelets <50,000, INR >1.50)
  • Untreatable contrast allergy
  • Symptomatic congestive heart failure
  • Prior systematic therapy for HCC

结局指标

主要结局

Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0

时间窗: Duration of study (12 months)

Assess the safety of SIS for TACE as per CTCAE v 4.03

Stasis of flow in target vessel as seen on digital subtraction angiography or cone-beam CT, or reflux of particles despite the use of SIS.

时间窗: During chemoembolization

Assess the technical feasibility of performing TACE using the SIS. If stasis of flow is not reached after 1 vial of DEB, further bland embolization will be performed until stasis is reached or earlier as determined adequate by the treating interventional radiologist.

次要结局

  • Tumor Assessment via MRI Imaging(Duration of study (12 months))
  • Tumor Assessment via CT Imaging(Duration of study (12 months))
  • FACT Hep4 Questionnaire(Visit 5 (week 5))

研究者

发起方
Alexander Kim
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Alexander Kim

Chief of Interventional Radiology at Medstar Georgetown University Hospital

Georgetown University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验