PACTR201302000478315招募中未知
A RANDOMISED CONTROL TRIAL COMPARING INTENSIVE WITH CONVENTIONAL EDUCATION FOR DIABETES MELLITUS PATIENTS IN CALABAR
Dr Akaninyene Otu0 个研究点目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2013年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Year(s) 至 100 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •¿HBA1c > 8.5 % measured before randomization.
- •¿Age > 18 years.
- •¿Able to exercise.
- •¿Available to participate if randomized in the program.
- •¿Provision of written informed consent.
排除标准
- •¿Significant eye disease limiting visual acuity.
- •¿Lower extremity amputation limiting exercise.
- •¿No written informed consent.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
TOPICAL LOCAL ANAESTHETIC SPRAY WITH VAPOCOOLANT VERSUS EMLA CREAM IN INFANTS DURING VACCINATIOCTRI/2021/05/033426DR AYUSH JAI228
招募中
不适用
VDT TRIASurgeryFertility-femaleLaparoscopy entry techniquesPACTR201510000999192DR GEORGE ELEJE200
尚未招募
不适用
A STUDY COMPARING THE OUTCOME OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPHY WITH AND WITHOUT INSTILLATION.CTRI/2019/09/021179CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE
招募中
4 期
Comparison of three methods of pain relief in patients undergoing gall bladder surgeryCTRI/2013/03/003493I150
已完成
不适用
Study to compare effect of method of providing oxygen at high flows with high flow nasal cannula vs conventional method of providing oxygen using bag and mask on time duration for which patient can maintain oxygen saturation.CTRI/2018/03/012870Dr Sanjeevani Zadkar60