Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03486470
NCT03486470
Unknown
Not Applicable

Comparison of Two Radial Artery Segments Related to "Old-Fashioned" Radial and New Snuff Box Vessel Approach. Ultrasound Study of Both Arms

Dr. Stephan Cherkezov Hospital0 sites520 target enrollmentApril 15, 2018
ConditionsHeart Diseases

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Heart Diseases
Sponsor
Dr. Stephan Cherkezov Hospital
Enrollment
520
Primary Endpoint
Comparison of ultrasound derived diameters of radial artery measured at sites related to two different transradial arterial approaches for catheterization
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if there is a difference in the size and the depth of the radial artery at the access points for established radial and new distal radial approach for the arteries of both arms

Detailed Description

Radial approach for coronary and peripheral procedures is now well established due to both patient and operator preference and carries a lower risk of bleeding and mortality. The most lasting consequence of transradial procedures remains radial artery occlusion, which is mainly influenced by the artery diameter and the size of the sheath. As a new, more distal approach looms on the horizon, it is plausible to determine factors that could impact its feasibility. Since the success rate for artery cannulation depends to a great extent on the size and the depth of the artery, the current study examines both parameters, as well as whether they are influenced by variables such as sex, body mass index, handedness, or comorbidities i.e. diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 15, 2018
End Date
August 15, 2018
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Dr. Stephan Cherkezov Hospital
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr. Valentin Krastev

Head of CathLab

Dr. Stephan Cherkezov Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients \>18 years old admitted to the Cardiology Department

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous transradial procedures
  • Arm AV fistula for dialysis access
  • History of upper limb peripheral arterial disease
  • Hemiparesis
  • Hemodynamic instability

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Comparison of ultrasound derived diameters of radial artery measured at sites related to two different transradial arterial approaches for catheterization

Time Frame: 1 day

Measuring diameters of the radial artery at the access points for well established radial and new distal radial approach and finding or not a significant difference could have some implications for choosing the access radial site. At the end of a routine echocardiographic evaluation, four short axis measurements (one proximal and one distal on each arm) of the radial artery diameters will be done with a vascular probe.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Impact of sex, BMI, hand-dominance or comorbidities on the size and the depth of the arterial segments(1 day)
  • Comparison of ultrasound derived depth of radial artery measured at sites related to two different transradial arterial approaches for catheterization(1 day)

Similar Trials