Comparing old pain relieving techniques with a new technique in patients scheduled for small incision heart surgery
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: I251- Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary arteryHealth Condition 2: Q211- Atrial septal defect
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients aged between 18 and 65 years who scheduled for minimally invasive cardiac surgery
Exclusion Criteria
1.Patient refusal.
2.Allergy to local anesthetics.
3.Localized infection.
4.Coagulopathy / Bleeding diathesis
5.Patients on anticoagulants
6.Left main coronary artery disease
7.Left Ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF) <40%
8.Emergency surgery
9.Redo surgery
10. Reexploration within 24 hours
11.Cognitive impairment or an active psychiatric condition.
12.Inability to understand pain scoring.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method to compare the analgesic efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block with rhomboid intercostal subserratus block in patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgeries.Timepoint: 48 hours post Extubation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare improvement in pulmonary function and oxygenationTimepoint: 48 hours post extubation