Adjusted Value of Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Obese Patients: A Comparative Study of Two Regimens of Enoxaparin
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Enoxaparin
- Conditions
- Thromboprophylaxis in Hospitalized Obese Patients
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Rouen
- Enrollment
- 92
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Evaluate the anti- Xa activity between a standard treatment by Enoxaparin (40mg/ day) and an adapted dose of enoxaparin (60 mg/day) for thromboprophylaxis in obese patients hospitalized
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common medical condition encountered during hospitalization in a medical environment. The use of thromboprophylaxis with Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux has reduced more than 50% relative risk of thromboembolic complications.However, while obesity defined by a body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2, is a major risk factor for venous thrombotic events, data on obese patients are limited. In fact, less than 20% of patients included in the three major studies of preventive medicine had a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and most studies specific to the obese population comes from a series of bariatric surgery patients or orthopedic surgery. The main results of this series show regarding the obese population a decrease of the anti-Xa activity during the administration of a standard dose of enoxaparin (40 mg / d). However, no specific recommendation in this population has not been published to date and therefore,the dosages currently used are the same regardless of the patient's weight. In this context, the use in obese patients hospitalized in a medical environment a stronger dosage of enoxaparin (60 mg / d) compared to the standard dose of 40 mg / day, could get rates anti-Xa activity levels more consistent with the treatment required, and thus reduce the risk for thromboembolic complications in these patients
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patient aged ≥ 18 ans.
- •Signed inform consent
- •Obesity defined by a BMI value ≥ 30 kg/m
- •Hospitalized for :
- •acute medical affection such as :
- •congestive heart failure (stage III or IV NYHA),
- •severe respiratory disease,
- •Infectious disease or acute rheumatologic disorder or inflammatory bowel disease with one or more additional risk factors, including active cancer, previous VTE, age \> 75 y-o, estrogen therapy, chronic heart failure or chronic respiratory disease
- •or recent myocardial infarction(\< 6 weeks), recent stroke with hemiparesis (\< 15 days), previous VTE, myeloproliferative syndrome associated with one or more additional risk previously cited.
- •Affiliation to a welfare system.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Subjects unwilling or unable to comply with study procedures
- •History of hypersensitivity to enoxaparin heparin induced thrombocytopenia
- •Previous history of heparin induced thrombopenia
- •acquired or inherited bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy,
- •Platelet count \< 50.000 G/L,
- •History of clinically significant bleeding
- •Severe renal insufficiency with CrCl \<30 ml/min (Cockcroft method),
- •Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- •Women without contraceptive methods
- •Severe peripheral arterial disease (Ankle blood pressure \<50mm Hg)
Arms & Interventions
Enoxaparin 40mg/ day
Enoxaparin administrated at the following dose : 40mg/ day
Intervention: Enoxaparin
Enoxaparin 60 mg/day
Enoxaparin administrated at the following dose : 60 mg/day
Intervention: Enoxaparin
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Evaluate the anti- Xa activity between a standard treatment by Enoxaparin (40mg/ day) and an adapted dose of enoxaparin (60 mg/day) for thromboprophylaxis in obese patients hospitalized
Time Frame: 3 hours after third Eoxaparin injection
Secondary Outcomes
- Compare the occurrence of symptomatic venous thrombosis (deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) and the relevant bleeding events according to the enoxaparin treatments(All along the study (max 14 days))