Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Myofascial Release Techniques for the Pectoralis Minor Muscle
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Pectoralis Minor Muscle Tension
- Sponsor
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- Enrollment
- 39
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- pectoralis minor length
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- last year
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of self-myofascial release, myofascial release with a physiotherapist and instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) techniques for the pectoralis minor muscle on pectoralis minor muscle length, rounded shoulder posture, glenohumeral joint total rotation range of motion (ROM) and skin temperature in asymptomatic individuals.
Detailed Description
In the literature, the effects of myofascial release and instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) applications on individuals with pectoralis minor muscle are investigated, but the available evidence is insufficient. In a study conducted in asymptomatic individuals, self-myofascial release was found to be more effective than placebo application in increasing glenohumeral flexion joint range of motion (ROM), improving pectoralis minor length and advanced scapular posture. However, there was one study comparing the short-term effectiveness of the self-myofascial release method and IASTM methods on pectoralis minor length, glenohumeral total arch movement and skin temperature in individuals with short pectoralis minor, and the results of both applications were found to be similar. Despite these studies in the current literature, the amount of evidence examining the effectiveness of myofascial release technique performed under the guidance of a physiotherapist in individuals with short pectoralis minor is insufficient. However, the number of studies comparing the immediate and short-term effects of different myofascial release methods on the pectoralis minor muscle lengthening is few. Given the limited evidence available, different myofascial release methods may produce different short-term responses on the pectoralis minor muscle, with different results on muscle length, scapular position, glenohumeral total arch motion, and superficial skin temperature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effects of 3 different myofascial release techniques on pectoralis minor muscle length, rounded shoulder posture, glenohumeral joint total rotation ROM and skin temperature in asymptomatic individuals.
Investigators
Büşra Aksan Sadıkoğlu
Principal Investigator
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •between the ages of 18-35
- •Presence of pectoralis minor shortness
- •Not having any upper extremity injury in the last 6 months
Exclusion Criteria
- •Presence of upper extremity surgery in the last 12 months
- •Presence of neurological disorder in the upper extremity
- •Any sensory problems or open wounds around the shoulder
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
pectoralis minor length
Time Frame: Baseline (first assessment)
The length of the pectoralis minor muscle will be evaluated by the physiotherapist by calculating the pectoralis minor index (PMI), which is an objective evaluation method. In the calculation of PMI, the distance between the inferomedial of the coracoid process and the caudal edge of the 4th rib in the sternum will be evaluated with a tape measure to measure the length of the pectoralis minor muscle, and the values will be recorded in centimeters. Then, the measured pectoralis minor muscle length value will be calculated by dividing the participant's height in centimeters multiplied by 100. The reference value for PMI is 7.44%.
Secondary Outcomes
- number of trigger points(Immediately after the intervention (second assessment))
- pectoralis minor length(Immediately after the intervention (second assessment))
- skin temperature(Immediately after the intervention (second assessment))
- glenohumeral joint total rotation ROM(Immediately after the intervention (second assessment))
- rounded shoulder posture(Immediately after the intervention (second assessment))
- pressure pain threshold(Immediately after the intervention (second assessment))