Difference between emergency intubation by different devices in critically ill patients
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: - Health Condition 2: 8- Other Procedures
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/02/062697
- Lead Sponsor
- Era Medical College and Hospital Lucknow
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Adult patients requiring emergency intubation
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with suspected difficult airway
2. Patients with any pathology of oral cavity that could obstruct insertion of device
3. Mouth opening less than 18mm
4. Cervical spine injury
Study & Design
- Study Type
- PMS
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare first attempt success rate between Video laryngoscope and Intubating LMA <br/ ><br>To compare intubation time taken in Video laryngoscope and Intubating LMATimepoint: Number of attempts <br/ ><br>Duration of intubation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method TO COMPARE THE HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE IN VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY AND INTUBATING LMA <br/ ><br>TO COMPARE INCIDENCE OF DESATURATION BETWEEN VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE AND INTUBATING LMA <br/ ><br>TO CHECK ANY OTHER COMPLICATIONS LIKE : <br/ ><br>PERI INTUBATION MOUTH DAMAGE <br/ ><br>PERI INTUBATION MUCOSAL DAMAGE <br/ ><br>POST INTUBATION DYSPHAGIA <br/ ><br>POST INTUBATION SORE THROAT <br/ ><br>PERI INTUBATION TEETH DAMAGE <br/ ><br>POST INTUBATION HOARSENESS <br/ ><br>PERI INTUBATION OESOPHAGEAL INTUBATIONTimepoint: 3 MINUTES AFTER INTUBATIO