Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06580548
NCT06580548Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

A New At-home Telerehabilitation Care Service Delivery Model for Stroke Survivors in the Rio Grande Valley

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston1 site in 1 country11 target enrollmentStarted: March 17, 2025Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
11
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change in basic mobility as assessed by the Acute Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Basic Mobility Outpatient Form (routine)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of a mobile telerehabilitation software for post-acute stroke care for Rio Grande Valley (RGV) stroke survivors with community health worker (CHW) at-home support and to estimate the functional health, mental health (depression), and caregiver burden outcomes of this new CHW-supported, at-home rehabilitation service delivery model and to identify salient barriers to and facilitators of adopting and delivering the new rehabilitation delivery model to further disseminate the model in real-world communities.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •A resident of the Brownsville, Texas (Cameron County) area
  • •SINGLE and FIRST qualifying stroke event with the ability to enroll and begin study activities within 3 months of onset of stroke event
  • •Pre-stroke modified Rankin score of ≤3 (less than moderate disability at baseline)
  • •Currently uninsured
  • •Spanish or English speaker
  • •Able to follow instructions (without aphasia that interferes with following instructions)
  • •Safe to perform basic strengthening rehabilitation exercises
  • •Able to stand with or without assistance

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Aphasia or cognitive impairment (e.g., dementia) that interferes with following instructions or prevents following the study-related activities)
  • •Pre-stroke motor deficits
  • •Current psychiatric disorders, including substance use disorder
  • •Underlying brain pathologies inclusive of brain malignancies, multiple sclerosis
  • •Insured patients as insured patients are referred for standard-of-care clinical rehabilitation.
  • •Medical instability to participate in basic strengthening rehabilitation exercises
  • •Inability to access internet from home to access at-home rehabilitation software for intervention arm participants
  • •Having received any outpatient rehabilitation services prior to study enrollment for intervention arm participants

Arms & Interventions

CHW-supported telerehabilitation plus Usual Care

Experimental

Intervention: CHW-supported telerehabilitation (Device)

CHW-supported telerehabilitation plus Usual Care

Experimental

Intervention: Usual Care (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change in basic mobility as assessed by the Acute Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Basic Mobility Outpatient Form (routine)

Time Frame: Baseline (week 1), week 3 (intervention participants only), week 6

This is an 18 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(unable) to 4( none) for a score range of 1-72, higher score indicating better outcome

Change in basic mobility as assessed by the Acute Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Basic Mobility Outpatient Form (low function )

Time Frame: Baseline (week 1), week 3 (intervention participants only), week 6

This is a 19 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(unable) to 3( none) for a score range of 0-57, higher score indicating better outcome

Change in basic activity as Acute Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Daily Activity Outpatient Short Form (routine)

Time Frame: Baseline (week 1), week 3 (intervention participants only), week 6

This is a 15 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(unable) to 4( none) for a score range of 1-60, higher score indicating better outcome

Change in basic activity as Acute Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Daily Activity Outpatient Short Form (low function)

Time Frame: Baseline (week 1), week 3 (intervention participants only), week 6

This is a 12 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(total) to 3( none) for a score range of 1-36, higher score indicating better outcome

Change in Health-related quality of life as assessed by the European Health-Related Quality of Life- 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) EuroQoL-5D five-level survey (EQ-5D-5L)

Time Frame: Baseline, week 3 (intervention participants only), week 6

This is scored across 5 dimensions , mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and each dimension is scored on a five-level severity ranking that ranges from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems), higher score indicating worse outcome

Change in Depression as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9)

Time Frame: Baseline, week 3 (intervention participants only), week 6

This is a 9 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(not at all) to 3(nearly every day) for a score range of 0-27, higher score indicating worse outcome

Change in caregiver burden as assessed by the Zarit Burden Interview

Time Frame: Baseline, week 3 (intervention participants only), week 6

This is a 12 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0(never) to 4(nearly always) for a score range of 0-48, higher score indicating worse outcome

Secondary Outcomes

  • Acceptability/Appropriateness of the intervention for the stroke survivors as assessed by the Quantitative Implementation Measures for Stroke Survivors questionnaire(Baseline)
  • Adoption of the intervention for the stroke survivors as assessed by the Quantitative Implementation Measures for Stroke Survivors questionnaire(Baseline)
  • Acceptability & Appropriateness of the intervention for the community health workers as assessed by the Quantitative Implementation Measures for Community Health Worker questionnaire(Baseline)
  • Adoption of the intervention for the community health workers as assessed by the Quantitative Implementation Measures for Community Health Worker questionnaire(Baseline)
  • Feasibility of Community Health Worker as assessed by the Quantitative Implementation Measures for Community Health Worker questionnaire(Baseline)
  • Acceptability/Appropriateness of the intervention for the stroke survivors as assessed by the Quantitative Implementation Measures for Stroke Survivors questionnaire(week 7)
  • Adoption of the intervention for the stroke survivors as assessed by the Quantitative Implementation Measures for Stroke Survivors questionnaire(week 7)
  • Acceptability & Appropriateness of the intervention for the community health workers as assessed by the Quantitative Implementation Measures for Community Health Worker questionnaire(week 7)
  • Adoption of the intervention for the community health workers as assessed by the Quantitative Implementation Measures for Community Health Worker questionnaire(week 7)
  • Feasibility of Community Health Worker as assessed by the Quantitative Implementation Measures for Community Health Worker questionnaire(week 7 (immediately after intervention))
  • Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants enrolled(end of study (week 7))
  • Adherence as assessed by the number of rehab videos watched in a day(end of study (week 7))
  • Number of participants that view ≥1 daily mobile rehab videos(end of study (week 7))

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Fadi Musfee

Assistant Professor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials