Development and Application of Precision Treatment Strategies for Common Mental Disorders

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Depression - Major Depressive Disorder; Schizophrenia Disorders; Bipolar Disorder (BD)

• Registration Number: NCT06729541
• Lead Sponsor: Peking University

Brief Summary

Schizophrenia (SCH), major depressive disorder (MDD), and bipolar disorder (BPD) are prevalent, disabling psychiatric conditions that not only cause significant suffering for affected individuals and their families but also impose a substantial socioeconomic burden and challenge societal well-being. Addressing the mental health challenges faced by patients, their families, and the healthcare system is a critical global public health priority. However, a comprehensive and systematic precision treatment approach for mental disorders remains largely absent in current clinical practice.

This study leveraged pharmacogenomic insights tailored specifically to the Chinese Han population to guide individualized medication selection. The approach incorporated quantitative assessment-based treatment protocols alongside therapeutic drug monitoring throughout the treatment process. The overarching goal was to establish a systematic precision treatment model that integrates "quantitative assessment-based treatment + pharmacogenomics + therapeutic drug monitoring." This model aims to optimize treatment outcomes, enhance safety, improve efficiency, and reduce costs, ultimately benefiting patients with psychiatric disorders.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2024-11-11
• Status Verified: 2024-12
• Study First Submitted: 2024-12-04
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-12-08
• Study First Posted: 2024-12-11
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-12-11
• Last Update Posted: 2024-12-12
• Primary Completion: 2026-07
• Study Completion: 2026-12

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 600

Inclusion Criteria

• Schizophrenia: (1) Age 18-65 years, no gender restriction, Han ethnicity; (2) Diagnosis confirmed using the MINI-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) tool, meeting the DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia; (3) Baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score ≥ 60; (4) Education level of middle school or higher, no language barriers, able to cooperate with assessment and treatment, and informed consent obtained from the patient or guardian.
• Depressive Disorder: (1) Age 18-65 years, no gender restriction, Han ethnicity; (2) Diagnosis confirmed using the MINI tool, meeting the DSM-5 criteria for depressive disorder; (3) Baseline Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score ≥ 17; (4) Education level of middle school or higher, no language barriers, able to cooperate with assessment and treatment, and informed consent obtained from the patient or guardian.
• Bipolar Disorder: (1) Age 18-65 years, no gender restriction, Han ethnicity; (2) Diagnosis confirmed using the MINI tool, meeting the DSM-5 criteria for manic or hypomanic episodes in bipolar disorder; (3) Baseline Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score ≥ 13; (4) Education level of middle school or higher, no language barriers, able to cooperate with assessment and treatment, and informed consent obtained from the patient or guardian.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with a history of or currently meeting the DSM-5 criteria for the following diagnoses: organic mental disorders, schizoaffective disorder, intellectual disability, dementia, other cognitive disorders, alcohol or drug dependence, and Axis II disorders including personality disorders;
• Patients with severe suicidal tendencies (as assessed by the MINI Chinese version suicide module with a moderate risk or higher), or those at risk of harming others;
• Patients with severe or unstable physical illnesses;
• Narrow-angle glaucoma;
• A history of epilepsy or seizures;
• Known pregnancy and/or breastfeeding, or those planning to become pregnant;
• Participation in another clinical trial, or unwilling or unable to complete the full course of this trial;
• Participants deemed unsuitable by the investigator.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)	Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the treatment duration	The outcome is assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The PANSS consists of 30 items, divided into three subscales: Positive Symptoms (7 items), Negative Symptoms (7 items), and General Psychopathology (16 items). Each item is rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The total PANSS score ranges from 30 to 210, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity.
Change from baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)	Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the treatment duration	The outcome is assessed by 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) Scale. Total HAMD scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Change from baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)	Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the treatment duration	The outcome is assessed by the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). The YMRS consists of 11 items that assess the severity of manic symptoms, including mood, speech, motor activity, sexual interest, sleep, and other behaviors. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater severity of manic symptoms. The total YMRS score can range from 0 to 44, with higher scores reflecting more severe mania.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Clinical Global Impression (CGI)	Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the treatment duration	The outcome is assessed by the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. The CGI consists of two main components: the CGI-Severity (CGI-S) and the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I).; CGI-Severity (CGI-S): This component rates the severity of the patient's illness on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients).; CGI-Improvement (CGI-I): This component evaluates the patient's improvement over time, also on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).; The CGI scale provides an overall clinical assessment of the patient's condition, considering both the severity of illness and the degree of improvement.
Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS)	Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the treatment duration, as well as Months 6 and 12.	The outcome is assessed by the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS). The MMAS is a self-reported scale used to assess a patient's adherence to prescribed medication regimens. It consists of 8 items that evaluate factors such as forgetfulness, understanding of medication instructions, and attitude toward treatment. The items are answered with "yes" or "no" responses, with higher scores indicating better medication adherence.; The MMAS is categorized as follows: High adherence: score of 8 Medium adherence: score of 6-7 Low adherence: score of 0-5
Plasma Drug Concentration	Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the treatment duration	The outcome is assessed by Plasma Drug Concentration. Blood drug levels of antidepressants, antipsychotics, and mood stabilizers are measured to determine whether the concentrations fall within the therapeutic range for each respective medication. Therapeutic drug monitoring ensures that plasma drug levels are within the safe and effective range, avoiding both sub-therapeutic and potentially toxic concentrations. The concentration of each drug is compared to the recommended therapeutic window to assess if the patient is receiving an optimal dose.
Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP)	Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the treatment duration, as well as Months 6 and 12.	The outcome is assessed by the Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP). The PSP is a clinician-rated scale designed to assess an individual's level of functioning in four key areas: Socially useful activities (e.g., work, education, social relationships) Personal and social relationships (e.g., relationships with family, friends, and the community) Self-care (e.g., personal hygiene, ability to live independently) Disturbing and aggressive behavior (e.g., level of agitation or violence); The PSP provides a global score ranging from 1 to 100, where lower scores indicate more severe dysfunction and higher scores indicate better social and personal performance. The total PSP score is classified as follows: Score 91-100: Normal functioning Score 61-90: Mild functional impairment Score 31-60: Moderate functional impairment Score 1-30: Severe functional impairment
Safety	Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the treatment duration	Laboratory tests (including complete blood count, liver and kidney function, prolactin levels, and electrocardiogram) were conducted at baseline and at Weeks 4, 8, and 12 of the treatment duration. Safety was assessed using adverse event scales (e.g., TESS and SAS).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Peking University Sixth Hostipal; 🇨🇳 Beijing, Beijing, China