Evaluation of Rate of Progression With Perimetry in Newly Diagnosed Open Angle Glaucoma
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Change in mean defect in Octopus perimetry
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to evaluate rate of progression in newly diagnosed open angle glaucoma with different types of perimetry. Would it be possible to find the rapidly progressing individuals sooner by doing perimetry more often? Is there a difference between different types of perimetry in early glaucoma? What would be the optimal timing of perimetry in newly diagnosed glaucoma? In addition the quality of life in glaucoma patients will be evaluated with two types of questionnaires in three different time points. The enrolled patients will receive appropriate treatment according to glaucoma management guidelines.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Recently diagnosed open angle glaucoma
排除标准
- •Significant visual impairment due to another disease (e.g. diabetic retinopathy or maculopathy, cataract, visual field defect after stroke)
- •Inability to perform perimetry reliably
结局指标
主要结局
Change in mean defect in Octopus perimetry
时间窗: Baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 22, 24 months
次要结局
- Change in VF-7- instrument score(2, 12, 24 months)
- Differences in visual field defects between Octopus, frequency doubling technology, RareBit-perimeters(2, 12, 24 months)
- Change in 15D-instrument score(2, 12, 24 months)
