Reading Intervention for Children With Intellectual Disabilities Who Require Augmentative and Alternative Communication
- Conditions
- Intellectual Disabilities
- Interventions
- Other: Reading intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT05709405
- Lead Sponsor
- Ostfold University College
- Brief Summary
The goal of this multiple single case study with multiple randomized baseline (with four starting points and 18 measurements across time) is to conduct a reading intervention for 40 children with intellectual disabilities who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC).
The main questions to answer are:
1. Is there a functional relation between the use of "Lesing for alle" (Reading for all) and increased accuracy of sound blending by students age 6-14 with intellectual disabilities who require AAC?
2. Is there a functional relation between the use of "Lesing for alle" (Lesing for alle) and improved acquisition of letter sound correspondence by students age 6-14 with intellectual disabilities who require AAC?
3. Is there a functional relation between the use of "Lesing for alle" (Reading for all) and improved acquisition of phoneme segmentation by students age 6-14 with intellectual disabilities who require AAC?
4. Is there a functional relation between the use of "Lesing for alle" (Reading for all) and improved acquisition of recognition of sight words by students age 6-14 with intellectual disabilities who require AAC?
5. Is there a functional relation between the use of "Lesing for alle" (Reading for all) and improved acquisition of decoding by students age 6-14 with intellectual disabilities who require AAC?
6. Is there a positive and strong correlation between increasing skills from 1-3 and 4-5? Meaning, is there a transfer from lower level skills (phonological skills) to decoding skills?
The participants (age 6-14) will receive daily instruction in a reading material that follows all the strategies of Accessible Literacy Learning, developed by Janice Light and David McNaughton. It is the teachers who will carry out the teaching in the students fixed and familiar place at school. The reading material consist of tasks in sound blending, letter-sound correspondence, phoneme segmentation, sight words and decoding. The reading material will use explicit instruction, distributed and cumulative practice, and immediate and corrective feedback. The intervention will take place for a total of 18 months.
- Detailed Description
The acquisition of reading skills is a critical need for all individuals and allow fuller participations in education and employment and gives access to personal expression, social media and enjoyable leisure pursuits. Individuals with intellectual disabilities who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) often face challenges in that they are met with too low expectations and low ambitions. There is also a lack of evidence-based reading programs and reading materials adapted for individuals who require AAC.
This study will conduct a reading intervention for children with intellectual disabilities who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Through the reading intervention, students will work with components such as sound blending, letter-sound correspondence, phoneme segmentation, sight words, shared reading and decoding. It will be used components of effective evidence-based literacy intervention such as explicit instruction, distributed and cumulative practice, and immediate and corrective feedback. All the instructional activities have been adapted, oral/spoken responses are not required, and the students can use alternative methods, such as signs, pointing at symbols or pointing with their eyes.
The aim of this study is to conduct a reading intervention for 40 children with intellectual disabilities who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to see if the students can acquire functional reading skills. Even simple reading skills can contribute to major changes in the individual's quality of life and to a greater independence in communication with the environment.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- Students between 6 and 14
- Students who are diagnosed with intellectual disabilities
- Students who do not have a functional speech, i.e. require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) to understand and/or make oneself understood.
- Students must use AAC as their primary form of communication
- Students cannot follow ordinary curricula (LK20) but have their own education plan.
- Students younger than six years and older than 14 years
- Students who have not been diagnosed within intellectual disabilities
- Students who have a functional speech and do not require AAC
- Students who follow ordinary education
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Reading Intervention Reading intervention The reading material is made based on the research of Professor Janice Light and Professor David McNaughton at Penn State University. The reading material "Lesing for alle" (Reading for all) contains all the principles, strategies, and methods that form the basis of Accessible Literacy Learning (ALL). The intervention is conducted by trained teachers, in a place known to the students. The material contains: tasks in sound blending, letter-sound correspondence, phoneme- segmentation, sight words, single-word decoding, and shared reading. Due to the multiple single baseline design, each participant will be regarded as being in the control condition, and then will be randonly assigned to four different baselines starting the intervention individually after the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th month.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Sound-blending trajectory change Every month, for 18 months Testing in sound blending involves testing the student's ability to combine individual sounds into words. The students will see a sheet of paper with four symbols. In the instructions, the target word will be presented by expanding the individual sound in the word.
Letter-sound correspondence trajectory change Every month, for 18 months Tests the student's ability to associate letter-sounds with corresponding letters. The students must discriminate between 4 symbols, and the instruction is, for example: point to "0".
Phoneme segmentation trajectory change Every month, for 18 months The students are measured on their ability to find the first sound in words. In the test, there must be discrimination between 4 symbols, and students must identify the word that begins with, for example, the sound "m".
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Sight-words change Three time points before, during, and after intervention (months 1, 12 and 18) Tests the students ability to recognize words they have learned by sight.
Decoding change Three time points before, during and after intervention (months 1, 12 and 18) Tests the students ability to convert the printed code (letters) of traditional ortography into words in order to derive meaning.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
University of South-Eastern Norway
🇳🇴Borre, Vestfold, Norway
Østfold University College
🇳🇴Halden, BRA Veien, Norway