Interventricular Delay of Lumax HF-T for Heart Failure
- Conditions
- Congestive Heart Failure
- Interventions
- Device: Optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing
- Registration Number
- NCT00508391
- Lead Sponsor
- Biotronik, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the safety and efficacy of the Lumax HF-T with optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing (OPT) is non-inferior to the Lumax HF-T with simultaneous biventricular pacing (SIM) in patients with heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy.
- Detailed Description
This study is a randomized, double-blinded, crossover, multi-center, prospective trial. The study will consist of up to 122 subjects who require treatment of advanced heart failure through cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with back-up defibrillation capabilities. Eligible patients will have a successfully implanted BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T CRT-D system and have received simultaneous biventricular pacing for a minimum of 90 days prior to enrollment. The 90-day period is being required to allow the treatment effect of CRT therapy with SIM to be complete and to ensure the patient is receiving a stable and optimal CHF medical regimen. The patients will have the interventricular delay feature programmed after a standardized optimization procedure. Patients, along with study personnel evaluating the study endpoint measures, will be blinded to the type of CRT therapy delivered during the study follow-up period.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 122
- Meet the indications for therapy
- Successfully implanted with a BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T CRT-D system and have received SIM for a minimum of 30 days prior to enrollment. A successful implantation is defined as having a measured LV pacing threshold which allows for a minimum 1-volt safety margin without any phrenic nerve stimulation at the time of enrollment.
- Treated with stable and optimal CHF medications, which includes an ACE inhibitor (ACE-I) or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) at therapeutic dose for 1 month prior to enrollment, if tolerated, and a Beta Blocker that is approved and indicated for HF for 3 months prior to enrollment, if tolerated, with a stable dosage for 1 month prior to enrollment. If the patient is intolerant of ACE-I or beta blockers, documented evidence must be available. Eplerenone requires dosage stability for 1 month prior to enrollment. Diuretics may be used as necessary to keep the patient euvolemic. Therapeutic equivalence for ACE-I substitutions is allowed within the enrollment stability timeliness. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or a 50% decrease in dose.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Able to understand the nature of the study and give informed consent
- Able to complete all testing required by the clinical protocol, including the 6-minute walk test and QOL questionnaire
- Available for follow-up visits on a regular basis at the investigational site
- Meet one or more of the contraindications
- Have a life expectancy of less than 6 months
- Expected to receive heart transplantation within 6 months
- Have had more than 1 CHF-related hospitalization within past 30 days
- Currently receiving IV inotropic medications
- Chronic atrial fibrillation
- Enrolled in another cardiovascular or pharmacological clinical investigation, except for FDA required post-market registries
- Any condition preventing the patient from being able to perform required testing
- Presence of another life-threatening, underlying illness separate from their cardiac disorder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Simultaneous 1st, Optimized 2nd Optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing Lumax HF-T device programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by optimized biventricular pacing for 30 days. Optimized 1st, Simultaneous 2nd Optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing Lumax HF-T device programmed to optimized biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by simultaneous biventricular pacing for 30 days.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Subjects Classified as "Not Worsened" for Changes in the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and Six-minute Walk Distance Between Periods of Optimized and Simultaneous Biventricular Pacing 60 days after enrollment The purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of optimized pacing (OPT) compared to simultaneous pacing (SIM). The hypothesis is evaluated based on a responder classification. Subjects are classified "not worsened" if after 30 days of OPT the quality of life (QOL) score is no more than 10 points higher and the six-minute walk distance is no more than 35 meters lower than after 30 days of SIM. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, a 21 question patient-completed survey, was used for QOL. Each question had a possible score of 0 (best) to 5 (worst), for a total of 0 to 105.
Percent of Subjects That Did Not Experience an Adverse Event That Require Additional Invasive Intervention to Resolve, Specifically Related to the Interventricular Delay Feature of the Lumax HF-T Heart Failure Device 60 days after enrollment The purpose of primary endpoint two is to evaluate adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, specifically those events that are directly related to the interventricular delay feature of the Lumax HF-T heart failure device. These adverse events include any software issues related to the programming of the interventricular delay or any event that occurs after optimization of the interventricular delay and that can be directly attributed to the use of the feature.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (19)
Georgia Arrhythmia Consultants
🇺🇸Macon, Georgia, United States
SSM Medical Group
🇺🇸St. Louis, Missouri, United States
Fananapazir
🇺🇸Cumberland, Maryland, United States
Solano Cardiology
🇺🇸Fairfield, California, United States
Sansum Clinic
🇺🇸Santa Barbara, California, United States
Cardiac Disease Specialists, P.C.
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Cardiology Consultants
🇺🇸Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Salem Cardiology
🇺🇸Salem, Oregon, United States
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Cardiac Arrhythmia Associates
🇺🇸La Jolla, California, United States
Cardiology Associates Medical Group
🇺🇸Ventura, California, United States
Gateway Cardiology
🇺🇸St. Louis, Missouri, United States
Michigan Cardiovascular Institute
🇺🇸Saginaw, Michigan, United States
Pee Dee Cardiology
🇺🇸Florence, South Carolina, United States
Palmetto Cardiology
🇺🇸Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Lone Star Heart Center
🇺🇸Amarillo, Texas, United States
Yakima Heart Center
🇺🇸Yakima, Washington, United States
University Hospital Zurich
🇨🇭Zurich, Switzerland
Cardiac Associates of Dallas
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States