Functional Electrical Stimulation for Footdrop in Hemiparesis

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Stroke
Hemiplegia

Interventions: Device: Odstock Dropped-Foot Stimulator (ODFS)
Other: Conventional Standard of Care
Procedure: Traditional Physical Therapy Treatment

Registration Number: NCT00148343

Lead Sponsor: MetroHealth Medical Center

Brief Summary: The objective of this research is to determine if electrical stimulation can improve the strength and coordination of the lower limb muscles, and the walking ability of stroke survivors.

The knowledge gained from this study may lead to enhancements in the quality of life of stroke survivors by improving their neurological recovery and mobility. The results may lead to substantial changes in the standard of care for the treatment of lower limb hemiparesis after stroke.

Detailed Description: Hemiplegia is a major consequence of stroke and contributes significantly to the physical disability of stroke survivors. Foot-drop, or inability to dorsiflex the paretic ankle during the swing phase of gait, and ankle instability during stance phase, are important gait abnormalities that contribute to reduced mobility among stroke survivors. In the United States, the standard of care in addressing these deficits is the custom molded ankle-foot-orthosis (AFO). However, evolving data now demonstrate that active repetitive movement training is the principal substrate for facilitating motor relearning after stroke. Motor relearning is defined as the reacquisition of motor ability after central nervous system injury. Thus, while an AFO may assist stroke survivors to ambulate in the short-term, it is possible that it also inhibits recovery in the long-term. Previous studies have demonstrated that active repetitive movement exercises mediated by neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) facilitate motor relearning among stroke survivors. In particular, studies have reported that some chronic stroke survivors treated with a peroneal nerve stimulator for foot-drop experience sufficient recovery that they no longer need the peroneal nerve stimulator or an AFO for community ambulation. However, there are no blinded randomized clinical trials that rigorously evaluate the motor relearning effects of ambulation training with peroneal nerve stimulators. Thus, the primary aim of this project is to assess the effects of transcutaneous peroneal nerve stimulation on lower limb motor relearning among chronic stroke survivors. The secondary aim is to assess the effects of transcutaneous peroneal nerve stimulation on lower limb mobility (disability) and overall quality of life. A single-blinded randomized clinical trial will be carried out to assess the effects of ambulation training with a peroneal nerve stimulator among chronic stroke survivors compared to ambulation training with conventional standard of care (which may include an AFO). Subjects will be treated for 12 weeks and followed for a total of another 6 months. This project will determine the effectiveness of peroneal nerve stimulation in facilitating motor relearning and improving the mobility and quality of life of stroke survivors. This proposed approach is expected to improve patient outcome and challenge the present clinical paradigm of prescribing AFOs for stroke survivors with foot-drop.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 110

Inclusion Criteria

Stroke survivors >90 days from most recent clinical hemorrhagic or nonhemorrhagic stroke
Age: 18-80 years
Unilateral hemiparesis
Medically stable
Sufficient endurance & motor ability to ambulate at least 30 feet continuously with minimal assistance [requiring contact guard to no more than 25% physical help] or less without the use of an AFO
Berg Balance Scale score of 24 or greater without any assistive devices
Ankle dorsiflexion strength of no greater than 4/5 on the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale while standing
Demonstrate foot-drop during ambulation such that gait instability [need for supervision, physical assistance or assistive device (cane, walker) to maintain balance or prevent falls] or inefficient gait patterns [gait pattern manifesting "dragging" or "catching" of the affected toes during swing phase of gait, or use of compensatory strategies such as circumducting the affected limb, vaulting with the unaffected limb or hiking the affected hip to clear the toes] are exhibited
Ankle dorsiflexion to at least neutral while standing in response to NMES of the common peroneal nerve without painful hypersensitivity to the NMES
If using an AFO, willing to terminate its use and comply with study requirements

Exclusion Criteria

Require an AFO to maintain knee stability (prevention of knee flexion collapse) during stance phase of gait
Edema of the affected lower limb which interferes with the safe and effective use of a peroneal nerve stimulator
Skin breakdown of the affected lower limb which interferes with the safe and effective use of a peroneal nerve stimulator
Absent sensation of the affected lower limb
History of potentially fatal cardiac arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia, supraventricular tachycardia, and rapid ventricular response atrial fibrillation with hemodynamic instability
Demand pacemakers or any other implanted electronic systems
Pregnant women
Uncontrolled seizure disorder
Parkinson's Disease
Spinal cord injury
Traumatic brain injury with evidence of motor weakness
Multiple sclerosis
Fixed ankle plantar flexor contracture
Peroneal nerve injury at the fibular head as the cause of foot-drop
Uncompensated hemineglect
Severely impaired cognition and communication
Painful hypersensitivity to NMES of the common peroneal nerve
Inadequate social support (potential unlikeliness to comply with treatment & follow-up)
History of Botulinum toxin (Botox) injection to either of the lower extremities within the 3 month period preceding study entry
Knee hyperextension (genu recurvatum) that cannot be adequately corrected with peroneal nerve stimulation

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
ODFS	Odstock Dropped-Foot Stimulator (ODFS)	Odstock Dropped-Foot Stimulator (ODFS)
ODFS	Traditional Physical Therapy Treatment	Odstock Dropped-Foot Stimulator (ODFS)
Standard of Care (inc. AFO)	Traditional Physical Therapy Treatment	Conventional Standard of Care (which may include a study-specific Custom Molded Hinged Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO)) \[Traditional Physical Therapy Treatment\]
Standard of Care (inc. AFO)	Conventional Standard of Care	Conventional Standard of Care (which may include a study-specific Custom Molded Hinged Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO)) \[Traditional Physical Therapy Treatment\]

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA)	Weeks 0, 12, 24, 36	Lower limb motor impairment as measured by the lower limb portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) which consists of 17 items, with a maximum possible score of 34 points, with lower scores indicating higher impairment. Each item was answered using a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform, 1 = can partially perform, 2 = can fully perform).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Gait Speed	baseline, 12, 24 and 36 weeks
Modified Emory Functional Ambulation Profile(mEFAP)	Weeks 0, 12, 24, 36	The mEFAP comprises 5 individually timed tasks performed over different environmental terrains. The subtasks include (1) a 5-meter walk on a hard floor; (2) a 5-meter walk on a carpeted surface; (3) rising from a chair, a 3-meter walk, and return to a seated position (the "timed up-and-go" test); (4) traversing a standardized obstacle course; and (5) ascending and descending 5 stairs. The mEFAP is performed with or without the use of an orthotic device or an AD. Manual assistance (MA) is provided as necessary. The subject can use rails when climbing the stairs. The 5 timed subscores are added to derive a total score in seconds.
Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)	Weeks 0, 12, 24, 36	The Stroke Specific Quality Of Life scale (SS-QOL) is a patient-centered outcome measure intended to provide an assessment of health-related quality of life specific to patients with stroke. Patients must respond to each question of the SS-QOL with reference to the past week. It is a self-report scale containing 49 items in 12 domains: Mobility, Energy, Upper extremity function, Work/productivity, Mood, Self-care, Social roles, Family roles, Vision, Language, Thinking, Personality. There are 11 subscales. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale with higher scores indicate better functioning. The overall SS-QOL summary score (summation of all items) is presented here. Scores range from 49-245.
Steps Per Minute	Weeks 0, 12, 24, 36	The number of steps taken by participants in one minute