Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2024/05/067558
CTRI/2024/05/067558
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of tunneled coronally advanced flap versus coronally advanced flap with collagen matrix for management of isolated gingival recession: A randomized clinical trial - NI

Army Dental Centre RR0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Army Dental Centre RR
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
last year
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
Army Dental Centre RR

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •a)Patients aged between 20 \- 40 years.
  • •b)Patients with isolated Cairo’s RT1 GR located on anteriors and premolar teeth.
  • •c)Patients with ASA 1 physical status classification.
  • •d)No surgical periodontal therapy in last 2 years at the involved site
  • •e)Teeth having clinically identifiable CEJ

Exclusion Criteria

  • •a)Teeth having root caries / non\-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) or previous restoration.
  • •b)Past or current tobacco users (both smoking and chewing tobacco).
  • •c)Pregnant/Expecting/Lactating women.
  • •d)Full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) \& Full mouth plaque score (FMPS) \= 10% after completion of Phase I therapy.
  • •e)Patients with a history of known allergy to xenogenic biomaterials.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Not Applicable
The Tunnel Technique and Free Gingival Graft in Gingival Recessions TreatmentGingival Recession
NCT05270161Universidade Federal de Alfenas60
Recruiting
Not Applicable
A comparative study of the effectiveness of two treatment methods, dry needling and kinesiotaping, in the treatment of tennis elbow
IRCT20230722058889N1Esfahan University of Medical Sciences62
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparing Two Different Tunneling Technique for Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different MatertialGingival Recession, Localized
NCT06065774Mansoura University80
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS OF TWO METHODS FOR MAINTAININGHEMODYNAMIC STABILITY IN LAPROSCOPIC SURGERIES.
CTRI/2023/02/049400MGM Medical College and Hospital Aurangabad
Completed
Not Applicable
Retrospective comparison of tunnelwidening (TW) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in two surgery techniques and two biocomposite interference screws.Tunnelwidening1004323710005944
NL-OMON43834Zuyderland Medisch Centrum80