MedPath

Efficacy and Safety of Alfacalcidol Compared to Calcitriol for Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
End Stage Renal Disease
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01115543
Lead Sponsor
Mahidol University
Brief Summary

This study was performed to determine whether calcitriol provides a therapeutic advantage to alfacalcidol for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in ESRD patients.

Detailed Description

Secondary hyperparathyroidism has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD).Both nonselective and selective vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs) are demonstrated in many studies for their efficacy on suppression of PTH. Most of them are quite expensive and unavailable in many countries. Calcitriol and alfacalcidol are less expensive and worldwidely distributed. There is only one short-term study which directly compares these two drugs. This study demonstrates that calcitriol is superior to alfacalcidol. However, alfacalcidol is a prohormone of calcitriol. It has to be converted by 25-hydroxylase at the liver to generate 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 to act on target cells. Many pharmacokinetics studies demonstrate that alfacalcidol has lower AUC compared to calcitriol if they are administered in the same dose. Therefore, the authors hypothesize that alfacalcidol may be equivalently efficacious as calcitriol if its dose is adjusted according to the pharmacokinetics studies.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
32
Inclusion Criteria
  • Chronic hemodialysis patients who underwent scheduled hemodialysis for at least 3 months with secondary hyperparathyroidism (intact PTH levels > 300 pg/mL)
Exclusion Criteria
  • (1) age < 18 years (2) hypersensitivity to calcitriol or alfacalcidol (3) inadequate dialysis [defined as single-pooled Kt/V (sp-Kt/V) <1.2 and <2.0 for thrice a week and twice a week hemodialysis] (4) corrected serum calcium >10.2 mg/dL or serum phosphate >6 mg/dL after adjusting dialysate calcium and phosphate binders (5) diameter of parathyroid gland >10 mm (6) pregnancy or lactation (7) liver cirrhosis (8) active kidney transplantation (9) previous parathyroidectomy (10) malignancy or chronic infection/inflammation.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
calcitriolalfacalcidol and calcitriolThe subjects were randomized to receive calcitriol in a dose-escalating fashion for up to 24 weeks.
alfacalcidolalfacalcidol and calcitriol-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Reduction of intact parathyroid hormone levels48 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia48 weeks

proportion of the patients who achieved a target PTH, changes in plasma calcium and phosphorus, the proportion of the patients who had hypercalcemia (plasma corrected calcium \> 10.8 mg/dl), hyperphosphatemia (plasma phosphorus \> 6.0 mg/dl) and calcium-phosphorus products \> 55 mg2/dl2 between groups.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Siriraj Medical School

🇹🇭

Bangkok-noi, Bangkok, Thailand

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath