Midterm results open versus closed wedge high tibial osteotomy: a follow-up study

Completed

• Conditions: standcorrection; valgus osteotomy; 10023213; 10005944

• Registration Number: NL-OMON35361
• Lead Sponsor: Rijnstate Ziekenhuis

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Last Update Posted: 6 May 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 50

Inclusion Criteria

Patients who had a CWO or OWO and participated in the study CMO 2002/181

Exclusion Criteria

-

Study & Design

• Study Type: Observational invasive
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<p>Our primary objective is to compare the midterm clinical and radiographic<br /><br>results (6 to 8 years) of CWO versus OWO with a locked plate fixation in the<br /><br>management of patients with medial knee OA and a varus leg alignment with a<br /><br>prospective follow-up study (of a previous RCT conducted by Gaasbeek et al.:<br /><br>CMO number 2002/181).The primary result is the survival rate at 5 year with as<br /><br>endpoints conversion to TKA or UKA and re-operation.</p><br>

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<p>Visual Analogue Scale pain, VAS satisfaction, the Western Ontario and McMaster<br /><br>Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society Score (KSS) and<br /><br>complications<br /><br><br /><br>Radiographic evaluation:<br /><br>Radiographs of varus leg alignment (loss of correction), of OA of the knee on<br /><br>AP and lateral views radiographs, Caton*s index (CI) and tibial slope on true<br /><br>lateral radiograph views in 30gr of flexion. </p><br>