跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02914678
NCT02914678已完成不适用

Is There an Ideal Dose of Intravenous Fentanyl in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Cluster-randomized Comparison of 2 vs. 3 μg/kg/Transport

University of Aarhus0 个研究点目标入组 7,093 人开始时间: 2016年10月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
7,093
主要终点
Proportion of patients with sufficient pain relief (NRS < 4) at hospital arrival

研究概览

简要总结

In a previous study the investigators evaluated the apparent efficacy and safety of intravenous fentanyl administered by ambulance personnel and found that 58.4% (CI 56.4-60.4) out of 2348 prehospital patients treated with fentanyl still experienced moderate to severe pain [numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10) > 3] at hospital arrival. The number of patients with possible fentanyl-related side effects was low.

Therefore, the aim of the present study is to explore the efficacy and safety of a liberalized pain treatment protocol for ambulance personnel (a total of 3 μg/kg per transport) compared with existing restrictive protocol (a total of 2 μg/kg per transport). The investigators hypothesize that:

  • A higher proportion of patients will experience sufficient pain relief at hospital admission (NRS < 4) using the liberalized protocol and
  • There will be no differences in the proportion of potential fentanyl related side-effects are observed.

详细描述

A prospective cluster-randomized trial observing proportional differences in sufficient pain relief at hospital admission (NRS < 4) and potential fentanyl related side-effects between patients treated by ambulance personnel applying either:

  • a more liberal treatment approach (a total of 3 μg/kg per transport) or
  • existing treatment approach (a total of 2 μg/kg per transport).

The Ambulance stations and their affiliated ambulance personnel are stratified into 5 clusters according to size/average transports per month and randomized to either liberal or existing treatment approach within each cluster. As patients are not randomized on an individual level baseline differences between the two groups and its patients are adjusted statistically with relevant confounders on 3 overall levels:

  1. Patients: Charlson Comorbidity Index Score, main overall diagnose category, inhospital surrogate measures of disease severity (intensive care unit admission and 30-day mortality).
  2. Ambulance personnel: Years of experience and preinterventional cumulative fentanyl administration and
  3. Ambulance stations and geographical factors: prehospital time measures and geographical distance from site of emergency to hospital.

These covariates are obtained from the Danish National Patient Registry, the Danish Civil Registration System and the electronic prehospital patient journal.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 110 Years(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with acute pain treated with intravenous fentanyl by ambulance personnel

排除标准

  • Reduced conscious level (GCS < 15) before initiation of fentanyl treatment
  • Reduced respiratory rate (< 10/minute) before initiation of fentanyl treatment
  • Patient weight < 30 kg
  • Known opioid allergy
  • Women in labour
  • Chronic pain conditions

结局指标

主要结局

Proportion of patients with sufficient pain relief (NRS < 4) at hospital arrival

时间窗: Up to 6 hours

次要结局

  • Proportion of patients with reduced Glasgow Coma Scale (<15) after fentanyl administration and at any given point during transport(Up to 6 hours)
  • Proportion of patients with reduced peripheral oxygen saturation (< 90%) after fentanyl administration and at any given point during transport(Up to 6 hours)
  • Proportion of patients with hypotension after fentanyl administration and at any given point during transport(Up to 6 hours)
  • Proportion of patients with reduced respiratory rate (<10/minute) after fentanyl administration and at any given point during transport(Up to 6 hours)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验