MedPath

Effects Of Muscle Energy Technique Versus Mobilization

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Interventions
Other: mobilization technique
Other: muscle energy technique
Registration Number
NCT04790500
Lead Sponsor
Riphah International University
Brief Summary

The aim is to describe the severity of pain in postpartum female and management of sacroiliac joint pain and disability and define the effects of manual therapy on sacroiliac joint dysfunction and pain

Detailed Description

The aim is to describe the severity of pain in postpartum female and management of sacroiliac joint pain and disability and define the effects of manual therapy on sacroiliac joint dysfunction and pain in postpartum females and to check whether the amount of gaining range of movement is similar among postpartum female undergoing with mobilization therapy and with muscle energy technique.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • 20-40 year having unilateral back pain around or on sacral sulcus,
  • Positive posterior pain provocation test for Sacroiliac joint dysfunction,
  • Low back pain within six weeks of delivery
  • Pain while sitting down, lying on the ipsilateral side of pain, or climbing stairs.
  • Local tenderness of the posterior aspect of the sacroiliac joint
  • Pain is usually localized over the buttock.
  • Sharp, stabbing, and/or shooting pain which extends down the posterior thigh usually not past the knee.
  • C-section
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Neurological deficit
  • Spinal tumors
  • Scoliosis,
  • Underwent spinal surgery and prolapsed
  • Intervertebral disc with or without radiculopathy
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group Amobilization techniquemobilization technique
Group Bmuscle energy techniquemuscle energy technique
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Modified Oswestry disability index4th week

It is a self-report questionnaire of a patient's perceived disability based on 10 areas of pain and daily activities (pain intensity, personal hygiene, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sexual activity, social activity and travelling). Each section is scored on a6-point scale (0-5), with 0 representing no limitation and 5 representing maximal limitation. The subscales combined add up to a total maximal score of 50. The score is then doubled and interpreted as a percentage of the patient-perceived disability (the higher the score, the greater the disability). In cases where patients did not answer all the 10 sections, the sum score of the answered sections were divided by the number of completed sections. The reliability of modified oswestry disability index is 0.88.

Numeric pain rating scale4th week

o The 11-point (numeric pain rating scale) NPRS will use to capture the patient's level of pain. The scale is anchored on the left with the phrase ''no pain'' and on the right with the phrase ''worst imaginable pain.'' Patients rate their current level of pain and their worst and least amount of pain in the last 24 hours. The average of the 3 ratings or any single rating may be used to represent the patient's level of pain. Numeric pain scales have been shown to be reliable and valid. The reliability of numeric pain rating scale is 0.74

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Pakistan railway hospital

🇵🇰

Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath