Emergency Department, Rapid Assessment for Sexually Transmitted Infection
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 1,200
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Diagnosis of a chlamydia trachomatis or neisseria gonorrhoeae
研究概览
简要总结
To evaluate if a rapid urine Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing (NAAT) is non-inferior to the traditional swab NAAT for gonorrhea and chlamydia when performed in the Emergency Department.
详细描述
All patients presenting to the Emergency Department during the study period who are tested for gonorrhea and chlamydia by the traditional swab NAAT will concurrently have their urine tested for gonorrhea and chlamydia using the Cepheid GeneXpert rapid NAAT. The result of both tests will be compared to determine if the rapid assay is non-inferior to the current traditional NAAT. Both the traditional and Cepheid GeneXpert rapid NAAT are FDA and CDC approved for evaluation of gonorrhea and chlamydia. However, the Cepheid GeneXpert rapid NAAT has not been prospectively validated in the Emergency Department setting. We intend for both the provider obtaining the sample and the technician running the rapid assay sample to be blinded to the result of the traditional NAAT. The Cepheid GeneXpert rapid NAAT will not be used in patient care decisions.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Clinical concern for gonorrhea and/or chlamydia infection
- •Concurrent testing for gonorrhea and chlamydia using traditional NAAT assay
排除标准
- •age <18 years
结局指标
主要结局
Diagnosis of a chlamydia trachomatis or neisseria gonorrhoeae
时间窗: 24 hours
comparative test characteristics to traditional swab in the Emergency Department.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Joseph Miller, MD
Clinical Physician
Henry Ford Health System