Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing Versus Traditional Patient Education in Promoting Oral Health Among Children
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 75
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Plaque index
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical study is to compare the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) and traditional patient education methods in improving oral hygiene (plaque score and bleeding score) among young children 8-10. It will also assess the demographic (age and sex) and socioeconomic indicators' effect on oral hygiene (plaque score and bleeding score) after intervention.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Is MI significantly more effective in improving oral health (plaque score, bleeding score) among children when compared to traditional patient education methods?
- Are there specific demographic or contextual factors (e.g., age, socioeconomic status, baseline oral health status) that influence the effectiveness of MI in promoting oral health among children when compared to traditional patient education methods?
Participants will be randomly assigned to three groups to receive oral hygiene instructions: verbal and written, video, and motivational interviewing.
Have their oral hygiene assessed using the plaque index and bleeding index before the intervention and after a follow-up period of 1 month.
Detailed Description
This clinical study aims to compare the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) and traditional patient education methods in improving oral hygiene (plaque score and bleeding score) among young children aged 8-10. The study is a randomized clinical trial that will be conducted among healthy pediatric patients attending the pediatric dentistry clinics at the University of Jordan Hospital.
Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and give consent will be randomly assigned to three groups:
- Verbal and written instructions group: Basic oral hygiene instruction will be given to this group on a model of the mouth and then supported by written instructions.
- Video monitored (VIDEO) group: Uploaded from the National Health Service (NHS) website and translated to the patient's mother tongue (Arabic).
- Motivational interviewing (MI) group: The participants will join the motivation sessions one-to-one, face-to-face, with the primary researcher, who will be trained and calibrated to provide MI and take sessions with qualified psychologists.
Oral hygiene will be assessed using two parameters:
Plaque index scoring: 0/1 Bleeding on probing score: 0/1 Each patient will be examined twice: the first time is before the intervention, and the second is after a follow-up period of 1 month.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Prevention
- Masking
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 8 Years to 10 Years (Child)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Children who are medically healthy
- •Children with normal manual dexterity
- •Children whose parents/guardians provide informed consent
- •Children not currently receiving orthodontic therapy
- •Children who do not require periodontal specialty care
- •Children with normal occlusion or mild, non-treatment-requiring malocclusion
Exclusion Criteria
- •Children with systematic, or syndromic disease
- •Children with special health care needs
- •Children with poor manual dexterity
- •Children with negative consents.
- •Children with current orthodontic therapy
- •Children with chronic diseases.
- •Children on medications that may cause drug-induced gingivitis.
- •Children who attend periodontal clinics.
- •Children with malocclusion
Arms & Interventions
Motivational interviewing
Intervention: Motivational interviewing oral hygiene instructions (Behavioral)
Video
Intervention: Video for oral hygiene instructions (Other)
Written and verbal instructions
Intervention: Written and verbal oral hygiene instructions (Other)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Plaque index
Time Frame: From enrollment to the 4-week follow-up appointment
The primary researcher will document the plaque index for each patient prior to the intervention and after the follow-up appointment after 1 month using Plaque Control Index scoring
Bleeding index
Time Frame: From enrollment to the 4-week follow-up appointment
The primary researcher will document the bleeding index for each patient prior to the intervention and during every follow-up appointment using Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI)
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Lamis D. Rajab
professor
University of Jordan