N6 Input Processing in Traditional CI Recipients
- Conditions
- Hearing Loss
- Interventions
- Device: Nucleus 6 Sound Processor
- Registration Number
- NCT02239263
- Lead Sponsor
- Cochlear
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the enhanced signal processing features of the Nucleus 6 Sound Processor on existing Nucleus cochlear implant recipients currently using the Nucleus 5 Sound Processor.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- Greater than 12 years
- Unilateral cochlear implant recipient (CI24RE, CI500, CI422)
- Minimum of 3 months experience with the N5 sound processor
- Prior documentation of sentence recognition testing in noise at a difficulty of +10 dB SNR or better
- Native English speaker
- Willingness to participate in and comply with all requirements of the protocol
- Unrealistic expectations
- Unwillingness to comply with investigational requirements of the protocol
- Additional handicaps that would prevent or restrict participation in the evaluations
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description N6 Input Processing Features Nucleus 6 Sound Processor -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Endpoint 1: Evaluation of Signal to Noise Ratio - Noise Reduction Visit 2, 1 month after baseline testing Speech understanding in noise using AzBio sentences with and without the SNR - noise reduction algorithm enabled. Speech understanding at a fixed +10 dB signal to noise level in each condition (on/off) is scored as percent correct and then subtracted to demonstrate the percent difference (benefit) in performance of having the algorithm on vs off.
Endpoint 2: Evaluation of SCAN Visit 2, 1 month after baseline testing Speech understanding in noise using AzBio sentences with and without SCAN algorithm enabled. Speech understanding at a fixed +10 dB signal to noise level in each condition (on/off) is scored as percent correct and then subtracted to demonstrate the percent difference (benefit) in performance of having the algorithm on vs off.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
Rocky Mountain Ear Center
🇺🇸Englewood, Colorado, United States
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Center for Hearing and Balance
🇺🇸Chesterfield, Missouri, United States
Houston Ear Research Foundation
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States