MedPath

Evaluation of Implant Stability in Low Quality Bone Following the Use of Osseodensifiers Versus Ridge Expanders

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Low Bone Density
Interventions
Procedure: Densah burs
Procedure: Ridge expansion screws
Registration Number
NCT05330546
Lead Sponsor
Cairo University
Brief Summary

the use of osseodensification technique compared to ridge expansion screws in low bone quality

Detailed Description

using Densah burs in preparation of implant osteotomy compared to ridge expansion screws in low quality bone

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
20
Inclusion Criteria
  • • Single tooth missing in the maxillary region with D3 (350-850 HU) and D4 (150-350 HU) bone (Sultana et al., 2020).

    • A minimum of 4 mm residual buccolingual bone width at site of implant placement (Koutouzis et al., 2019).

      • The recipient site of the implant should be free from any pathological conditions.
      • No diagnosed bone disease or medication known to affect bone metabolism.
      • Patients who are cooperative, motivated and hygiene conscious.
      • Patients having adequate inter-occlusal space of 8-10 mm (Fernández et al., 2017)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Systemic conditions/diseases that contraindicate surgery (Jarikian et al., 2021).

    • Patients who have any habits that might jeopardize the osseointegration process, such as current smokers (Vollmer et al., 2020).
    • Patients with parafunctional habits that produce overload on implant, such as bruxism and clenching (Sultana et al., 2020).
    • Alcohol or drug abuse (Ibrahim et al., 2020).
    • Pregnant and lactating women.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Osseodensification technique groupDensah burs10 patients will be randomly assigned to the osseodensification group so the implant osteotomy will be prepared using densah burs
Ridge expansion screw groupRidge expansion screws10 patients will be randomly assigned to the ridge expansion screw group so the implant osteotomy will be prepared using ridge expansion screws
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Implant stabilitychange from baseline at 6 month

assessing the stability using Osstell

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Radiographic bone densitychange from baseline at 6 month

using CBCT in mm

Change in crestal bone levelchange from baseline at 6 month

using CBCT in mm

Change in buccolingual bone widthchange from baseline at 6 month

using CBCT in mm

Patient reported outcomesat time of surgery

10 mm Visual analogue scale from 1 to 10 with 1 minimal pain and 10 worst pain experience

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Cairo University

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath