Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT05330546
NCT05330546
Completed
Not Applicable

Evaluation of the Stability of Implants Placed in Low Quality Bone Following the Use of Osseodensification Technique Versus Ridge Expanders: Randomized Clinical Trial

Cairo University1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentApril 1, 2022
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsLow Bone Density

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Low Bone Density
Sponsor
Cairo University
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Implant stability
Status
Completed
Last Updated
last year
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSitesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

the use of osseodensification technique compared to ridge expansion screws in low bone quality

Detailed Description

using Densah burs in preparation of implant osteotomy compared to ridge expansion screws in low quality bone

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 1, 2022
End Date
June 30, 2024
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mariam Samir Nabih

Assistant lecturer

Cairo University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •• Single tooth missing in the maxillary region with D3 (350-850 HU) and D4 (150-350 HU) bone (Sultana et al., 2020).
  • •A minimum of 4 mm residual buccolingual bone width at site of implant placement (Koutouzis et al., 2019).
  • •The recipient site of the implant should be free from any pathological conditions.
  • •No diagnosed bone disease or medication known to affect bone metabolism.
  • •Patients who are cooperative, motivated and hygiene conscious.
  • •Patients having adequate inter-occlusal space of 8-10 mm (Fernández et al., 2017)

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Systemic conditions/diseases that contraindicate surgery (Jarikian et al., 2021).
  • •Patients who have any habits that might jeopardize the osseointegration process, such as current smokers (Vollmer et al., 2020).
  • •Patients with parafunctional habits that produce overload on implant, such as bruxism and clenching (Sultana et al., 2020).
  • •Alcohol or drug abuse (Ibrahim et al., 2020).
  • •Pregnant and lactating women.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Implant stability

Time Frame: change from baseline at 6 month

assessing the stability using Osstell

Secondary Outcomes

  • Radiographic bone density(change from baseline at 6 month)
  • Change in crestal bone level(change from baseline at 6 month)
  • Change in buccolingual bone width(change from baseline at 6 month)
  • Patient reported outcomes(at time of surgery)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Unknown
Not Applicable
Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional MethodsDental Implant Stability
NCT05390996University of Baghdad35
Recruiting
Phase 2
Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss And Implant Stability In Maxillary Implant Overdenture When Using Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drills: A Randomized Clinical TrialCompletely Edentulous MaxillaImplant PlacementMaxillary Implant Overdenture
NCT05559632Cairo University10
Completed
Phase 3
By checking stability of implant and bone density around implant this study will be comparing two growth factors namely concentrated growth factor and injectable platelet rich fibrin when mixed with bone graft and used in maxillary sinus floor lifting procedure during implant surgery
CTRI/2023/08/057033Dr Unnati Agarwal10
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluating the effect of ossseodensification technique of implant placement on bone around dental implants.Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth
CTRI/2023/03/050409Husbana Bakrolwala
Completed
Not Applicable
The Effect of Osseodensification on Implant Stability in Posterior MaxillaImplant Stability
NCT04442763Cairo University20