Evaluation of Implant Stability in Low Quality Bone Following the Use of Osseodensifiers Versus Ridge Expanders
- Conditions
- Low Bone Density
- Interventions
- Procedure: Densah bursProcedure: Ridge expansion screws
- Registration Number
- NCT05330546
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
the use of osseodensification technique compared to ridge expansion screws in low bone quality
- Detailed Description
using Densah burs in preparation of implant osteotomy compared to ridge expansion screws in low quality bone
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
-
• Single tooth missing in the maxillary region with D3 (350-850 HU) and D4 (150-350 HU) bone (Sultana et al., 2020).
-
A minimum of 4 mm residual buccolingual bone width at site of implant placement (Koutouzis et al., 2019).
- The recipient site of the implant should be free from any pathological conditions.
- No diagnosed bone disease or medication known to affect bone metabolism.
- Patients who are cooperative, motivated and hygiene conscious.
- Patients having adequate inter-occlusal space of 8-10 mm (Fernández et al., 2017)
-
-
Systemic conditions/diseases that contraindicate surgery (Jarikian et al., 2021).
- Patients who have any habits that might jeopardize the osseointegration process, such as current smokers (Vollmer et al., 2020).
- Patients with parafunctional habits that produce overload on implant, such as bruxism and clenching (Sultana et al., 2020).
- Alcohol or drug abuse (Ibrahim et al., 2020).
- Pregnant and lactating women.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Osseodensification technique group Densah burs 10 patients will be randomly assigned to the osseodensification group so the implant osteotomy will be prepared using densah burs Ridge expansion screw group Ridge expansion screws 10 patients will be randomly assigned to the ridge expansion screw group so the implant osteotomy will be prepared using ridge expansion screws
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Implant stability change from baseline at 6 month assessing the stability using Osstell
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Radiographic bone density change from baseline at 6 month using CBCT in mm
Change in crestal bone level change from baseline at 6 month using CBCT in mm
Change in buccolingual bone width change from baseline at 6 month using CBCT in mm
Patient reported outcomes at time of surgery 10 mm Visual analogue scale from 1 to 10 with 1 minimal pain and 10 worst pain experience
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Cairo University
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt