Comparison of Acceptability of Intrauterine Enabler Device with Conventional Method of insertion of CuT 380 A: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/06/025578
- Lead Sponsor
- Pregna International Ltd
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Open to Recruitment
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Women opting for interval intrauterine device Cu T 380 A as a method of contraception
Exclusion Criteria
Patients opting for post abortion, post placental IUCD, postpartum IUCD
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare client and provider acceptability after insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device IUCD CuT 380A by two methodsTimepoint: Patient enrolment and data collection : 7 months <br/ ><br>Final report : 3 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. To compare client comfort and perception after insertion of ntrauterine contraceptive device IUCD CuT 380A by two methods <br/ ><br>2. Compare fundal placement of intrauterine devices by ultrasonographyTimepoint: 1 year <br/ ><br>