Comparison between treatment time and condylar volume of conventional Twin Block and LILT assisted Twin Block therapy
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K089- Disorder of teeth and supporting structures, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/04/065038
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Anjali Anil Kalekar
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Clinically:
a)Each subject with a full cusp class II or end-on molar relationship bilaterally with convex facial profile.
b)Overjet more than 5mm.
c)Patients in whom clinical VTO (Visual treatment objective) improves with anterior positioning of mandible.
Radiographically:
a)A pre-treatment cephalometric analysis with ANB angle more than 4 degrees with favourable functional analysis and favourable growth pattern.
b)Subjects who are in accelerated phase of pubertal growth spurt (MP3-FG and MP3-G stage).
a)Subject had a previous history of any orthodontic treatment
b)Nasal stenosis due to structural problems.
c)Non-growing individuals.
d)Syndromic cases.
e)Subjects that require asymmetric advancement.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method