MedPath

Effect of Inferior Alveolar and Gow-Gates Nerve Block Techniques for Symptomatic Mandibular Molars

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis
Interventions
Procedure: GGNB injections
Procedure: IANB injections
Procedure: GGNB + IANB injections
Registration Number
NCT03117491
Lead Sponsor
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
Brief Summary

Introduction: to evaluate the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), Gow-Gates nerve block (GGNB), and their combination in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Methods: One hundred fifty subjects with irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular molar were selected. subjects randomly received two IANB injections or two GGNB injections or their combination of 1.8 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Success was specified as no or mild pain on the basis of Heft-Parker visual analogue scale recordings up on the access cavity preparation or initial instrumentation. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, and ANOVA tests.

Detailed Description

Introduction: to evaluate the efficacy of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), Gow-Gates nerve block (GGNB), and their combination in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Methods: One hundred fifty subjects with irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular molar were selected. subjects randomly received two IANB injections or two GGNB injections or their combination of 1.8 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Success was specified as no or mild pain on the basis of Heft-Parker visual analogue scale recordings up on the access cavity preparation or initial instrumentation. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, and ANOVA tests.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria
  • vital mandibular molar tooth
  • diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
Exclusion Criteria
  • younger than 18 years old
  • history of significant medical conditions
  • allergies to local anesthetics or sulfites
  • pregnancy
  • taking any medications that might influence anesthetic assessment
  • active sites of pathosis in area of injection
  • inability to give informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
GGNB injection techniqueGGNB injectionsIn GGNB group, every patient received two1.8-mL cartridges of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine using the GGNB technique
IANB injection techniqueIANB injectionsIn IANB group, every patient received two 1.8-mL cartridges of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine using the IANB technique
GGNB + IANB injection techniqueGGNB + IANB injectionsIn IANB + GGNB group, every patient received one 1.8-mL cartridges of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine using the IANB technique and one 1.8-mL cartridges of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine using the GGNB technique
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
the success rate of GGNB + IANB local anesthesia techniques based on Heft-Parker visual analog scaleat time of access cavity preparation
the success rate of IANB local anesthesia technique based on Heft-Parker visual analog scaleat time of access cavity preparation
the success rate of GGNB local anesthesia technique based on Heft-Parker visual analog scaleat time of access cavity preparation
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
initial pain based on Heft-Parker visual analog scalebefore treatment

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

🇮🇷

Isfahan, Iran, Islamic Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath