Optimizing Residential Treatment Gains for Adolescents
- Conditions
- Adolescent - Emotional ProblemParentingMental Disorder in Adolescence
- Registration Number
- NCT05764369
- Lead Sponsor
- Ohio State University
- Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of a web-based parent training augmented with facilitated parent groups. This hybrid group-based parenting program (called Parenting Wisely for Residential Treatment; PWRT) is designed to prepare parents for the reintegration of their adolescents in the home after intensive psychiatric residential treatment. Researchers will compare PWRT to treatment as usual to determine whether PWRT effects target mechanisms (i.e., family function, social support, parental self-efficacy, parenting practices) and adolescent outcomes (i.e., internalizing and externalizing behaviors, placement restrictiveness).
- Detailed Description
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) design is employed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, engagement of target mechanisms, and preliminary effects of PWRT in parents with adolescents transitioning from residential treatment (RT) to the community. Parents (n=60) will be randomly assigned to receive Parenting Wisely augmented with facilitated discussion groups (referred to as PWRT; n=30) or treatment-as-usual (TAU; n=30). In the PWRT condition, parents will complete 2 web-based modules in an online parent training program called Parenting Wisely. Parents will also attend a 90-minute discussion group via Zoom. The RCT will allow for testing of target mechanism engagement (i.e., parental self-efficacy, parenting behaviors, social support, family function) and the intervention's effects on adolescent outcomes (i.e., internalizing behaviors, externalizing behaviors, placement restrictiveness). Parents will complete assessments at baseline (T1), six weeks post-baseline (T2), and six months post-baseline (T3) via REDCap. While adolescents (n=60) will not directly receive the intervention, they will complete assessments at baseline, six weeks post-baseline (T2), and six months post-baseline (T3).
Aim 1: Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of PWRT. 1a. Evaluate the feasibility of PWRT by tracking the frequency, dose, and duration. 1b. Evaluate the acceptability of PWRT for parents with adolescents in RT.
Aim 2: Determine the effects of PWRT on the target mechanisms compared to the TAU condition from baseline to 6-weeks and 6-months post-baseline.
Aim 3: Determine the effects of PWRT on adolescent outcomes compared to the TAU condition from baseline to 6-weeks and 6-months post-baseline. 3a. Determine if changes in the target mechanisms are associated with adolescent outcomes at six weeks and six months post-baseline.
Exploratory Aim: Explore the feasibility of collecting data from adolescents in an RT facility by tracking frequency (recruitment, enrollment, retention rates), duration (time between parent consent and assent; survey duration), and barriers to data collection.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 64
- Caregiver (e.g., biological, step, kin, foster, adoptive) to an adolescent aged 11-17 years old admitted to psychiatric residential treatment;
- The caregiver is allowed contact with the adolescent;
- Has access to a device (e.g., smartphone) with internet access.
Adolescent Inclusion Criteria:
- Ability to understand and willingness to provide written assent
- Legal guardian provides written consent;
- Currently or previously admitted to psychiatric residential treatment
- Aged 11-17 years at enrollment;
Parent and Adolescent
- Not able to speak English
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Group Attendance (Feasibility) Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline The mean number of groups attended by participants.
Module Completion (Feasibility) Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline The mean number of modules completed by participants in Parenting Wisely.
Module Duration (Feasibility) Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline The mean time participants spent completing one module in Parenting Wisely.
Group Duration (Feasibility) Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline The mean amount of time participants spent in a single session of the group.
PWRT Acceptability Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline Participants will complete a satisfaction survey to evaluate the acceptability of PWRT. The satisfaction survey consists of 13-items. Total scores range from 0-39; higher scores indicate greater perceptions of acceptability.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Adolescent Internalizing Behaviors Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline Adolescent internalizing behaviors will be assessed using the Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) for ages 6 to 18. The BPM consists of 19 items derived from the Child Behavior Checklist. The subscales include internalizing, externalizing, and attention subscales. Raw scores range from 0-38; higher scores indicate greater internalizing behaviors.
Change in Adolescent Externalizing Behaviors Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline Adolescent externalizing behaviors will be assessed using the Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) for ages 6 to 18. The BPM consists of 19 items derived from the Child Behavior Checklist. The subscales include internalizing, externalizing, and attention subscales. Raw scores range from 0-38; higher scores indicate greater externalizing behaviors.
Change in Restrictiveness of Living Environment Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline The Restrictiveness Evaluation Measure (REM) will be administered to parents and adolescents to evaluate perceptions of adolescent placement restrictiveness. The REM was designed and tested in residential treatment settings. There are two subscales; one scale identifies 25 placement settings varying in restrictiveness and the second subscale consists of questions about the activity and lifestyle restrictions in such placements. Total scores range from 24-120; higher scores indicate more restrictive living environments.
Change in Family Function Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline The McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD) will be administered to parents to evaluate changes in family function. The FAD consists of 60-items that assess seven domains of family function: problem-solving, family roles, communication, affective involvement, affective responsiveness, behavioral control, general functioning. Total scores range from 60-240; higher scores indicate better family function.
Change in Social Support Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline The Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey will be administered to parents to evaluate changes in social support. The MOS consists of 19-items that assess five social support domains: emotional support, informational support, tangible support, affectionate support, and positive social interaction.Total scores range from 20-100; higher scores indicate greater social support.
Change in Parenting Self Efficacy Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline Parents will complete the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) to evaluate changes in parental self-efficacy. The PSOC consists of 17-items and is designed for parents with children aged birth to 17. The two subscales in the PSOC are satisfaction and efficacy. Total scores range from 17-102; higher scores indicate greater perceptions of self-efficacy and confidence.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ohio State University College of Nursing
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
Ohio State University College of Nursing🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States