Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04478942
NCT04478942
Completed
Early Phase 1

PROMMO Trial: Prelabor Rupture of Membranes Managed With Oral Misoprostol Versus Intravenous Oxytocin

University of Wisconsin, Madison1 site in 1 country138 target enrollmentOctober 26, 2020

Overview

Phase
Early Phase 1
Intervention
Misoprostol Oral Product
Conditions
Premature Rupture of Membrane
Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Enrollment
138
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Primary Endpoint: Time from initial medication administration to vaginal delivery
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a prospective, randomized trial looking at the ideal method of labor induction for women with prelabor rupture of membranes and an unfavorable cervical Bishop score. The study will compare oral misoprostol and intravenous oxytocin.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to look at optimal induction management of prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) at or beyond 34 weeks gestational age. Objective 1: To determine if there is a decrease in time from initiation of induction of labor to vaginal delivery in women with an unfavorable cervix with the use of oral misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin. Hypothesis: Cervical ripening with misoprostol will be beneficial in women with an unfavorable cervix. Sub objective 1: To determine if the use of oral misoprostol for cervical ripening decreases the rate of postpartum hemorrhage in women with PROM. Hypothesis: Misoprostol use will result in significantly lower rate of postpartum hemorrhage. Sub objective 2: To evaluate the rates of infectious morbidity in peripartum women and neonates exposed to misoprostol versus oxytocin in PROM. Hypothesis: The use of oral misoprostol will result in lower rates of infectious morbidity in mother and neonate. Sub objective 3: To analyze patient satisfaction surveys. Hypothesis: Patients in the oral misoprostol group will be more satisfied with their labor experience. Exploratory Outcome To determine if there is a difference in cost between induction of labor in women with an unfavorable cervix with the use of oral misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin. Hypothesis: The use of oral misoprostol will be cost effective in women presenting with PROM and an unfavorable cervix.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 26, 2020
End Date
January 14, 2025
Last Updated
8 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Early Term to late term pregnancy (\>37 weeks and 0 days and \<42 weeks and 0 days)
  • Late Preterm Pregnancy (34 weeks and 0 days and \<37 weeks)
  • Confirmed rupture of membranes by either sterile speculum exam or AmniSure
  • Simplified Bishop Score ≤ 6
  • Maternal Age \> 18 years old
  • Singleton gestation
  • Appropriate gestational age dating by certain LMP or ultrasound performed prior to 20 weeks gestational age

Exclusion Criteria

  • Concern for intra-amniotic infection
  • Previous Cesarean delivery
  • Lack of appropriate dating criteria for the pregnancy
  • Inability to give informed consent in the patient's native language
  • Known bleeding disorder such as von Willebrand's disease or hemophilia
  • Anticoagulation administration within 24 hours of delivery

Arms & Interventions

oral misoprostol

At time of delivery, participants randomly assigned to either oral misoprostol will receive 50 mcg of Misoprostol every 4 hours up to 6 doses, OR until simplified Bishop score \>6 (whichever is achieved first).

Intervention: Misoprostol Oral Product

intravenous oxytocin

At time of delivery, participants randomly assigned to intravenous oxytocin, will be administered the drug per standard of labor and delivery titrations.

Intervention: Intravenous Oxytocin

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Primary Endpoint: Time from initial medication administration to vaginal delivery

Time Frame: Up to 72 hours

time from initiation of induction of labor to vaginal delivery in women with an unfavorable cervix with the use of oral misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin

Secondary Outcomes

  • Secondary endpoint 2: Rate of Suspected or Confirmed Intrapartum Intramniotic Infection(Prior to delivery)
  • Secondary endpoint 3: Rate of Suspected Endometritis(From delivery to 6 weeks postpartum)
  • Secondary endpoint 1: Rate of Postpartum Hemorrhage(up to 24 hours for immediate postpartum hemorrhage)
  • Secondary endpoint 4: Rate of Infectious Morbidity for Neonates(up to 6 weeks of life)
  • Secondary endpoint 5: Participant Satisfaction as Measured by modified Labour Agentry Scale(Postpartum day one with repeat instrument at 6 weeks postpartum)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials