Early Optimization of Ceftazidime Regimen in Critical Care
- Conditions
- Infection in ICUSepsisSeptic ShockPseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection
- Interventions
- Biological: plasma ceftazidime dosage
- Registration Number
- NCT07085624
- Brief Summary
Hospital-acquired infections, most of which are caused by Gram-negative bacteria, are common in intensive care units and have a major impact on patient prognosis. Patient survival in severe sepsis and septic shock depends on the early administration of appropriate antibiotic therapy, with mortality increasing by 7.6% for each hour of delay, justifying the probabilistic use of broad-spectrum antibiotics such as ceftazidime, an essential betalactamine, particularly used for its activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a frequent pathogen in nosocomial infections.
It is currently recommended that ceftazidime should initially be administered as a 2g loading dose, followed by maintenance treatment by continuous infusion, at a dose adapted to renal function.
The recommended dosage regimen, with its 2g loading dose, was developed using the median value of parameters from a pharmacokinetic model. This explains the findings of many critical care studies, which have found that 40-60% of patients initially have concentrations below target with the recommended dosing regimen.
In the context of critical care, maintaining concentrations within the target therapeutic range is difficult due to variations in the elimination clearance of ceftazidime. Ceftazidime is mainly eliminated by the kidneys. Critical patients may have increased glomerular filtration rate, or, conversely, impaired renal function, with rapid variations in the event of severe infection. This leads to high intra- and inter-individual variability, and increases the risk of antibiotic under- or overdose when the maintenance dose is administered at a fixed dose (6g/d continuously). This high variability can also be observed in the volume of distribution (capillary leakage, oedema, perfusion volumes, effusions ...).
In order to propose an individualised dosing regimen, we therefore propose an iterative randomised study to :
* Step 1: FORTOPTIM_1 Evaluation of an optimised dosage regimen based on literature data compared with the standard psological regimen.
* Step 2: FORTOPTIM_2 Build a pharmacokinetic model from the prospective data obtained in step 1. Based on this model, an individualised dosage regimen (loading dose and maintenance dose) will be obtained for step 3.
* Step 3: FORTOPTIM_3 Prospectively evaluate in a randomised trial the individualised dosing regimen previously defined (Step 2) by comparing it to the best dosing regimen determined in Step 1 or to the standard dosing regimen if there is no significant difference in Step 1.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 128
Not provided
- Pregnant woman, parturient, nursing mother;
- Person deprived of liberty, hospitalized without consent,
- Adults under legal protection (guardianship-curatorship)
- Patients undergoing extra-renal purification or whose CKD-EPI at the start of treatment is less than 15 ml/min.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SEQUENTIAL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description ceftazidime standard dosage regimen ceftazidime Loading dose 2g Maintenance dose : 6g/d if GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate) ≥ 60 3g/d if GFR between 30 and 60 1.5g/d if GFR between 15 and 30 ceftazidime standard dosage regimen plasma ceftazidime dosage Loading dose 2g Maintenance dose : 6g/d if GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate) ≥ 60 3g/d if GFR between 30 and 60 1.5g/d if GFR between 15 and 30 ceftazidime optimised dosage regimen ceftazidime Loading dose 4g Maintenance dose : 6g/d if GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate) ≥ 60 3g/d if GFR between 30 and 60 1.5g/d if GFR between 15 and 30 ceftazidime optimised dosage regimen plasma ceftazidime dosage Loading dose 4g Maintenance dose : 6g/d if GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate) ≥ 60 3g/d if GFR between 30 and 60 1.5g/d if GFR between 15 and 30
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of subjects with a ceftazidime concentration equal to or above the target concentration threshold (35 mg/L) at both 3h and 24h after the first administration, and below the toxicity threshold of 100 mg/L. 24 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Patient severity assessed using the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score) day 7 SOFA score from 0 to 24 The higher the score (24), the greater the incidence of organ failure
death day 28 Occurrence of neurological adverse events defined as: seizure, myoclonus, encephalopathy or delirium, altered consciousness (Glasgow score) day 28 Occurrence of an overdose defined as a concentration greater than 100 mg/L. day 28 Renal function assessment day 28 creatinine clearance (mL/mn) with the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease - Epidemiology Collaboration) equation
Time to reach PK/PD (pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics) targets 24 hours
Trial Locations
- Locations (8)
CHU GRENOBLE, Médecine intensive
🇫🇷Grenoble, France
HCL Croix Rousse, Médecine intensive réanimation
🇫🇷Lyon, France
HCL Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Médecine intensive et réanimation
🇫🇷Lyon, France
CHU Nord, Médecine intensive et réanimation
🇫🇷Marseille, France
HCL Hôpital Lyon Sud, Médecine intensive réanimation
🇫🇷Pierre Benite, France
CHU ST-ETIENNE - Médeine Intensive Réanimation
🇫🇷St-etienne, France
CHU ST-ETIENNE, Médecine intensive Réanimation B
🇫🇷St-etienne, France
CHU ST-ETIENNE, Réanimation Néphrologie
🇫🇷St-etienne, France
CHU GRENOBLE, Médecine intensive🇫🇷Grenoble, FranceGuillaume MD DUMASContact+33476767021GDumasgalant@chu-grenoble.fr