MedPath

The REST Study for CGM Use in Older Adults With Insulin-treated Diabetes

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus
Interventions
Device: Continuous Glucose Monitor
Registration Number
NCT05337826
Lead Sponsor
Joslin Diabetes Center
Brief Summary

To assess the efficacy of the REST model in facilitating adoption and sustained use of CGM, in older adults with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) or Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) on complex insulin regimens. To examine barriers and enablers for the implementation feasibility of the REST intervention model using a mixed-methods approach. To assess the impact of REST model on economic factors and quality of life measures. The goal of this study is to facilitate the adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in older adults (≥65 years) with diabetes mellitus (DM) on complex insulin regimens, and additionally, to build a framework for sustained CGM use over time using a novel patient-centered model - the REST model.

Detailed Description

Older adults with diabetes on multiple insulin injections are at greater risk of hypoglycemia and its poor outcomes. Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has shown to improve glycemic control and reduce hypoglycemia in this age group. Despite Medicare coverage for CGM, uptake in this age group is still low. The goal of this study is to facilitate the adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in older adults (≥65 years) with diabetes mellitus (DM) on complex insulin regimens, and additionally, to build a framework for sustained CGM use over time using a novel patient-centered model - the REST model. This model will assess Readiness and barriers to CGM initiation and utilization, provide remote Education, and implement a framework for Sustainability of CGM Technology adoption. The study will assess the impact of the REST model and its ability to increase CGM uptake and use in this age group, as well as its effectiveness on improving glycemic metrics. The study will also evaluate the impact of the REST model on economic and health-related quality-of-life measures.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
122
Inclusion Criteria
  • Older adults age ≥65 years
  • T1D or T2D with duration longer than 1 year
  • Insulin treatment includes: ≥3 insulin injections/day or on insulin pump therapy
  • CGM naïve and/or CGM users (Dexcom G6) who are not meeting glycemic goals (per

CGM metrics):

  • ≥4% hypoglycemia (sensor glucose ≤70 mg/dL) or
  • time in range (70-180 mg/dL) TIR ≤40 %
  • Willing to wear CGM Dexcom at all times while in the study
  • Willing to use/carry personal or loaned smart phone device to use as Dexcom receiver for continual data upload to cloud
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Life expectancy <1 year
  • End-stage renal disease (eGFR< 30ml/min)
  • On acetaminophen >4 gr/day due to interference with Dexcom G6 sensor readings
  • On hydroxyurea therapy due to interference with Dexcom G6 sensor readings
  • Impaired vision and hearing which would interfere with participation in remote video visits
  • Use of hybrid closed-loop systems (this may require different and additional focused education and will not be addressed in this study).
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Single ArmContinuous Glucose Monitor-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The co-primary effectiveness outcomesBaseline to 6 months

Change in time spent in hypoglycemia (sensor glucose \<70 mg/dL and ii) Change in individualized Time in Range goal

The co-primary implementation outcomesBaseline vs 6 months

Change in adoption of CGM by remote education (change in number of CGM users and ii) change in number of hours of CGM use per week

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Resource utilization6 months vs 12 months

Change in resource utilization (episodes of severe hypoglycemia, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations)

Time spent in hypoglycemia6 months vs 12 months

Change in time spent in hypoglycemia ( sensor glucose \<70 mg/dL)

Diabetes health related quality of life measuresBaseline vs 6 months

Change in quality of life measures (diabetes distress, hypoglycemia fear, EQ-5D)

Cost Effectivness12 months

Cost-effectiveness ratios to assess the economic aspects for REST model compared standard of care

Visits to maintain CGM useMonth 12

Total time spent and the number of remote and in-person visits needed to initiate and maintain CGM use

Cost effectivness6 months

Cost-effectiveness ratios to assess the economic aspects for REST model compared standard of care

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Joslin Diabetes Center

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

SUNY Upstate Medical University

🇺🇸

Syracuse, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath