Comparison of Two Bending Angles for Nasotracheal Intubation With a Malleable Vedio Stylet
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Enrollment
- 98
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Success rate of nasotracheal intubation
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Video intubating stylet can be safely and effectively used for nasotracheal intubation, but the optimal bending angle is still unknown. In this study, the optimal bending angle will be determined by comparing the intubation time and success rate of nasotracheal intubation with video intubating stylet at two different bending angles.
Detailed Description
intubation will be accomplished at 70 bending angle and 90 degrees bending angle in each group. intubation time, success rate, additional manoeuvres and epistaxis will be recorded and compared.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients require nasotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
- •fixed, or limited, neck movement, obstructive sleep apnoea, bilateral nasal obstruction or patients with an abnormal coagulation status
Arms & Interventions
70-degree bending angle group
intubation with a 70-degree bending angle
Intervention: bending angle (Device)
90-degree bending angle group
intubation with a 90-degree bending angle
Intervention: bending angle (Device)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Success rate of nasotracheal intubation
Time Frame: Procedure (From the beginning of intubation to the end of intubation)
The percentage of successful nasotracheal intubation
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Juhui Liu
Plastic Surgery Hospital
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences