跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06685575
NCT06685575Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Comparative Outcomes of Conventional Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Decompression Surgery Versus Endoscopic Foraminotomy Surgery in Stable Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis An Ambi-directional Cohort Study

Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 52 人开始时间: 2024年11月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
发起方
入组人数
52
试验地点
2
主要终点
Oswestry disability index (ODI) score post-operation at 12months

研究概览

简要总结

Comparative Outcomes of Conventional Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Decompression Surgery Versus Endoscopic Foraminotomy Surgery in Stable Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis An Ambi-directional Cohort Study

详细描述

Backgrounds :

Lumbar foraminal stenosis is a condition in which a spinal nerve is entrapped in a narrow lumbar foramen in degenerative lumbar spinal disorders. The gold standard treatment of this condition has not been proposed yet. Several different techniques for this problem has been described, including foraminotomy, facetectomy, partial pediculectomy, fusion, and distraction instrumentation.Nowadays, due to the great advancement of the technology in endoscopy expanded the indication of endoscopic decompression from the central canal to the extraforaminal zone, Which was difficult to gain access from the mere microscope.

Objectives :

To compare outcomes between posterior decompression With conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and full-endoscopic foraminoplasty (FELF) in stable lumbar foraminal Stenosis

Methods :

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Sequential
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
30 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age 30-80
  • Persist radiculopathy and sciatica pain
  • Patient that was diagnosed Stable lumbar foraminal stenosis
  • Failed conservative for at least 6 months
  • Patients who willing to join the study

排除标准

  • Patients with unstable lumbar foraminal stenosis
  • Patient with spine infection or tumor or fracture
  • Patient with BMD less than -2.5 or osteopenia
  • Patient with inflammatory joint diseases who on steroids
  • Patient who has undergo with surgery that inserted metals in back
  • Unable to answer questionnaires
  • Cannot tolerate surgery due to severe medical comorbidities

结局指标

主要结局

Oswestry disability index (ODI) score post-operation at 12months

时间窗: 12 months

Oswestry disability index (ODI) questionnaire at 12 months postoperative. The final score/index ranges from 0-100. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed-bound. Minimal clinical difference has been evaluated across numerous types of spinal surgery, and has been shown to vary significantly.

次要结局

  • Oswestry disability index (ODI) score post-operation at 6week, 3 months and 6 months(6week, 3 months and 6 months)
  • visual analog scale (VAS) of pain both leg and back(1day, 2 weeks, 6weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months)
  • estimated blood loss (EBL)(perioperation)
  • operative time(perioperation)
  • length of hospital stay(from 3 days to 1 week)
  • time return to work(through the study completion, an average of 1 year)
  • postoperative complications(through the study completion, an average of 1 year)

研究者

发起方
Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验