Efficacy and safety of hourly titrated misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone and misoprostol for and labor induction: randomized clinical trial.
- Conditions
- labor inductionTherapeutic area: Body processes [G] - Physiological processes [G07]
- Registration Number
- EUCTR2015-003412-20-ES
- Lead Sponsor
- Basque Health System
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Authorised-recruitment may be ongoing or finished
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
? Women over 18
? single pregnancy
? cephalic presentation
? intact membranes
? unfavorable cervix ( less than 6 Bishop )
? CTGR not reactive decelerative
? Signed informed consent by the patient.
Are the trial subjects under 18? no
Number of subjects for this age range:
F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) yes
F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 372
F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no
F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range
? prior Cesarean section or previous uterine surgery .
? Allergy or intolerance to any of the study drugs
? stillbirth
? uterine growth restricted fetuses
? contraindication for vaginal delivery
? Anterior placenta
? Multiparity
? moderate to severe heart disease
? hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
? Suspected chorioamnionitis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional clinical trial of medicinal product
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method