跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04385043
NCT04385043Unknown2 期

Efficacy and Safety of Hyperimmune Plasma Treatment in Patients With COVID-19 Severe Infection

University of Catanzaro5 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 400 人开始时间: 2020年5月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
2 期
发起方
入组人数
400
试验地点
5
主要终点
decrease in mortality

研究概览

简要总结

Passive immunotherapy through plasma infusion of convalescent subjects - convalescent plasma - or "hyperimmune" plasma was one of the most widespread and effective anti-infective treatments in the pre-antibiotic era and one of the founding pillars of immunology, and has also been used during the SARS (2002-2003) and Ebola (2014-2016) viral epidemy for which there were no alternative immunoprophylactic or therapeutic interventions.

To date, there are not proven etiological therapies for SARS-CoV-2 infection, the agent responsible for the disease called Covid-19. Among those subjected to clinical studies during the current epidemic in China, hyperimmune plasma appears to be one of the most rational and promising.

The objective of this study will be to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the hyperimmune plasma administered add-on to the anti-Covid-19 treatment (standard therapy) according to clinical practice in patients with severe Covid-19 infection, compared to patients with severe Covid-19 infection treated only with standard therapy.

详细描述

Passive immunotherapy through plasma infusion of convalescent subjects - convalescent plasma - or "hyperimmune" plasma was one of the most widespread and effective anti-infective treatments in the pre-antibiotic era and one of the founding pillars of immunology. Immunoprophylaxis represents an irreplaceable protection for post-exposure prevention of several viral infections such as measles, hepatitis B and rabies. Recently, the use of convalescent plasma for therapeutic purposes has been re-evaluated during the SARS (2002-2003) and Ebola (2014-2016) epidemic caused by serious viral infections for which there were no immunoprophylactic or therapeutic interventions. alternative. The results of these experimental interventions, despite the limited number and the often anecdotal character, have shown promise even if not conclusive. In the case of SARS, the first human respiratory disease caused by a Coronavirus, treatment with convalescent plasma was associated with a 23% reduction in mortality and with the best results if administered at an early stage of the disease. In addition, all the evidence available in the literature has confirmed the safety of convalescent plasma treatments, in line with what has already been observed in the transfusion practice with Fresh Frozen Plasma.

As is known, there are currently no proven etiological therapies to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection, the agent responsible for the disease called Covid-19. Among those subjected to clinical studies during the current epidemic in China, hyperimmune plasma appears to be one of the most rational and promising.

Waiting for the numerous clinical trials underway especially in Asia and accessible on the website http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/default.aspx to define if and to what extent this therapeutic contribution improves the prognosis of patients suffering from serious forms of infections from SARS-Co-2, the clinical guidelines of the People's Republic of China, already provide for the use of hyperimmune plasma with the indication "in rapidly progressive disease, severe and very severe form" and by the FDA .

As regards the technical protocols for the preparation of hyperimmune plasma for clinical use in the literature, precise references are available in particular for the preparation, qualification, viral inactivation and dosage of hyperimmune plasma for the treatment of viral epidemic infections such as MERS and Ebola and which can also be validated and used for the preparation of plasma from convalescent patients for Covid-19.

From the above, the objective of this study will be to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the hyperimmune plasma administered add-on to the anti-Covid-19 treatment (standard therapy) according to clinical practice in patients with severe Covid-19 infection, compared to patients with severe Covid-19 infection treated only with standard therapy.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • inclusion criteria for donors: null-gravid, with a negative history of transfusion of blood components; possibility to sign the informed consent
  • inclusion criteria for Covid-19 infected patients: serious Covid-19 infection, possibility to sign the informed consent (also through the legal tutor)

排除标准

  • exclusion criteria for donors: presence of pregnancy, recent history of transfusion of blood components, < 18 years.
  • exclusion criteria for Covid-19 infected patients: non serious Covid-19 infection, impossibility to sign the informed consent (also through the legal tutor)

研究组 & 干预措施

plasma-hyperimmune

Experimental

enrolled patients (n=200) with severe Covid-19 infection will receive a treatment with plasma hyperimmune add on to the standard therapy

干预措施: plasma hyperimmune (Other)

plasma-hyperimmune

Experimental

enrolled patients (n=200) with severe Covid-19 infection will receive a treatment with plasma hyperimmune add on to the standard therapy

干预措施: standard therapy (Drug)

standard therapy

Active Comparator

enrolled patients (n=200) with severe Covid-19 infection will receive a treatment with the standard therapy

干预措施: standard therapy (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

decrease in mortality

时间窗: 30 days

Statistically significant reduction (P \<0.05) of mortality in the group of patients treated with hyperimmune plasma vs patients treated with standard therapy.

次要结局

  • lymphocytes(7 and 14 days)
  • PCR levels vs control(7 and 14 days)
  • AB levels and clinical improvement(30 days)
  • PCR levels vs before treatment(7 and 14 days)
  • Inflammatory cytokines vs before treatment(7 and 14 days)
  • Inflammatory cytokines vs controls(7 and 14 days)

研究者

发起方
University of Catanzaro
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Luca Gallelli

MD

University of Catanzaro

研究点 (5)

Loading locations...

相似试验