Pacing of the Atria in Sick Sinus Syndrome Trial Preventive Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation
- Conditions
- Sick Sinus Syndrome
- Registration Number
- NCT00161538
- Lead Sponsor
- Medtronic BRC
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine which of 4 lead positions is most effective for pacemaker patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome in order to avoid development of atrial fibrillation.
- Detailed Description
The incidence of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in Sick Sinus Syndrome patients treated with pacing is quite high. As AF can cause dizziness, fatigue, thromboembolism and ischemic stroke it is clinically relevant. Due to earlier publications pacing modes and lead placement seem to influence the incidence of AF. In this study the incidence of AF will be compared between 4 different atrial lead positions:
1. Free atrial wall
2. right atrial appendage
3. coronary sinus-os
4. Dual site right atrial pacing: b) plus c).
The following primary parameters will be evaluated during the study period of 2 years after implantation:
1. Amounts of AF episodes with a duration of \> 48 hours
2. Amounts of AF episodes with a duration of \> 30 minutes
3. Consultations of physicians due to AF Secondarily, AF burden, Incidence of AF in total, Quality of Life, implant duration and complications will be evaluated.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 456
- Sick Sinus Syndrome
- Symptomatic sinus bradycardia
- Symptomatic SA block
- Bradycardia-Tachycardia-Syndrom
- Binodal diseases, Sinus Node Syndrome and high degree AV-Block
- In case of antiarrhythmic drug therapy: patient must be on a stable dose for at least 3 months before enrollment
- Permanent atrial tachycardia that cannot be transferred into sinus rhythm by drugs or electric cardioversion
- Decompensated heart failure
- Dilatative cardiomyopathy with an ejection fraction < 35%
- Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
- Symptomatic hypo- or hyperthyreosis
- Myocardial infarction less than 6 months ago
- Planned cardiac surgery intervention
- Pregnant woman
- Patients under 18 years of age
- Patients involved in other studies
- Patients, already implanted with other (cardiac) leads
- Patients with reduced expectancy of life due to other diseases
- Patients who are not able to agree in participation of the study
- Patients, who cannot attend follow-up visits due to their place of residence
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The incidence of AF is determined via memory of the pacemaker, which is saved at every follow-up visit at 1 and 10 days after implant and further on at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after implant. 24-Hour ECG and treadmill exercise as well as echocardiography shall be performed before implant and 6, 12 and 24 months after implant
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Treadmill exercise test as well as echocardiography shall be performed before implant and 6, 12 and 24 month after implant. Quality of Life questionnaires are obtained before implant and 12 and 24 months after implants
Trial Locations
- Locations (12)
Klinikum Ingolstadt
🇩🇪Ingolstadt, Germany
Universitätskrankenhaus Eppendorf
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Kalk GmbH
🇩🇪Köhl, Germany
Helios-Klinikum Aue
🇩🇪Aue, Germany
Klinikum Coburg
🇩🇪Coburg, Germany
Städtisches Krankenhaus Friedrichshafen
🇩🇪Friedrichshafen, Germany
Klinikum der Joh.-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität
🇩🇪Frankfurt, Germany
Werner-Forssmann-Krankenhaus GmbH
🇩🇪Eberswalde, Germany
Kreiskrankenhaus Leer
🇩🇪Leer, Germany
Krankenhaus Maria Hilf
🇩🇪Mönchengladbach, Germany
Ambulantes Herz-Zentrum Dresden
🇩🇪Dresden, Germany
Evang. Krankenhaus
🇩🇪Holzminden, Germany