Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2024/10/075429
CTRI/2024/10/075429
Completed
Phase 3

A randomized, open label, interventional clinical study to assess the efficacy and safety of Orah Glo E for bright and radiant skin.

Orah Nutrichem Pvt. Ltd2 sites in 1 country24 target enrollmentStarted: October 30, 2024Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Orah Nutrichem Pvt. Ltd
Enrollment
24
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
1.The study will evaluate the efficacy of the treatment through multiple assessment tools.

Overview

Brief Summary

Participants: 24 randomized into a single group

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Female subjects, 18-45 years old (skin types IV to V).
  2. Diagnosed with Melasma, Post-acne pigmentation, Post-inflammatory hypermelanosis, Seborrhoeic melanosis, Photo tanning, or Frictional melanosis.
  3. No participation in any other clinical trial in the past 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Major treatment (e.g., topical hydroquinone, tretinoin, cryotherapy, laser, IPL) in the past 3 months.
  2. History of allergies to whitening products.
  3. Past history of atopic dermatitis.
  4. Frequent sun exposure >4 hours/day.
  5. Pregnant or lactating women.
  6. Hypersensitivity to any study formulation components.
  7. Any condition deemed inappropriate by the investigator for study inclusion.

Primary Outcome Measures:

  1. Hyperpigmentation Reduction: Mean decrease in darkness of the target area assessed by Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at baseline and 4 weeks.

  2. Photo Damage: IGA assessment of photo damage at baseline and 4 weeks.

  3. Wrinkle Evaluation: Crow’s feet wrinkles assessed using the Bazin scale at baseline and 4 weeks.

  4. Skin Quality Assessment: Grading of radiance, smoothness, pigmentation, erythema, pore size, clarity, brightness, tone, luminosity, and complexion (1-10 scale).

  5. Skin Brightness & Wrinkle Reduction: Measured by Cutometer and Chromameter/Mexameter at baseline, Day 7, Day 14, and Day 28.

  6. Global Improvement: Self-assessment and investigator evaluation of overall improvement (improved, unchanged, or deteriorated) at the end of the study.

  7. Efficacy Scoring: Investigator’s assessment of treatment efficacy (0 = no effect, 1 = poor, 2 = reasonable, 3 = good, 4 = excellent).

Secondary Outcome Measure:

  1. Monitoring of adverse events and assessment of quality of life during the study period.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18.00 Year(s) to 45.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • 1.Female subjects who are 18 to 45 years of age.
  • (skin types IV to V) 2.Patients with Melasma, Post acne pigmentation, post inflammatory hypermelanosis, Seborrhoeic melanosis, Photo tanning and Frictional melanosis will be included.
  • 3.Subjects not have participated in any other clinical trial during the past 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria

  • 1.Having major treatment, including topical hydroquinone or tretinoin, cryotherapy, electrosurgery, trichloroacetic acid application, laser or intense pulsed light, in the 3 months before the beginning of the study 2.Past history of allergy to whitening cosmetic products 3.Past history of atopic dermatitis 4.Habit of frequent sun exposure longer than 4 hours per day 5.Pregnant or lactating women.
  • 6.Hypersensitivity to any of the components of the test formulation.
  • 7.The presence of any other condition that leads the investigator to conclude that the patient is inappropriate for inclusion in this clinical study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

1.The study will evaluate the efficacy of the treatment through multiple assessment tools.

Time Frame: Visit 1 - Day 1 | Visit 2 - Day 7 | Visit 3 - Day 14 | Visit 4 - Day 28

2.The investigator will measure the mean reduction in hyperpigmentation at baseline and after 4 weeks using the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA).

Time Frame: Visit 1 - Day 1 | Visit 2 - Day 7 | Visit 3 - Day 14 | Visit 4 - Day 28

3.Photo damage will also be evaluated with IGA at both time points.

Time Frame: Visit 1 - Day 1 | Visit 2 - Day 7 | Visit 3 - Day 14 | Visit 4 - Day 28

4.Crows feet wrinkles will be assessed using Bazins scale at baseline and week 4.

Time Frame: Visit 1 - Day 1 | Visit 2 - Day 7 | Visit 3 - Day 14 | Visit 4 - Day 28

5.Skin quality will be assessed by both the investigator and the subject, focusing on radiance, smoothness, pigmentation, and other factors, with scores ranging from 1 to 10.

Time Frame: Visit 1 - Day 1 | Visit 2 - Day 7 | Visit 3 - Day 14 | Visit 4 - Day 28

6.Skin brightness and wrinkle reduction will be measured using Cutometer and Chromameter or Mexameter at baseline, week 1, 2, and 4.

Time Frame: Visit 1 - Day 1 | Visit 2 - Day 7 | Visit 3 - Day 14 | Visit 4 - Day 28

7.Global improvement will be evaluated by the subject and investigator through self-assessment and photographs. Based on primary outcomes, the treatment’s efficacy will be scored from 0 (no effect) to 4 (excellent effect).

Time Frame: Visit 1 - Day 1 | Visit 2 - Day 7 | Visit 3 - Day 14 | Visit 4 - Day 28

Secondary Outcomes

  • To monitor for any adverse events during the study period and assess quality of life

Investigators

Sponsor
Orah Nutrichem Pvt. Ltd
Sponsor Class
Pharmaceutical industry-Indian
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Roshany

DK Elite Health Care Centre

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials